[bug #13495] repetition operator syntax changed in 4.2.21

2005-07-29 Thread James Youngman
Update of bug #13495 (project findutils): Item Group:None => Wrong result Status: In Progress => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed Fixed Release

[bug #13495] repetition operator syntax changed in 4.2.21

2005-07-06 Thread James Youngman
Update of bug #13495 (project findutils): Depends on: => bugs #13615 ___ Reply to this item at: __

[bug #13495] repetition operator syntax changed in 4.2.21

2005-07-03 Thread James Youngman
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #13495 (project findutils): What about newlines - it seems logical to treat newlines no differently to other characters. After all, newlines are treated specially in text files as they are the line terminators. This not the case for filenames.

[bug #13495] repetition operator syntax changed in 4.2.21

2005-07-03 Thread James Youngman
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #13495 (project findutils): OK, I've been reworking the code to use RE_SYNTAX_EMACS by default. I've hit a temporary stumbling block however; I have discovered that "find -iregex" doesn't work on systems which need to use gnulib's regex.c implementation. On the affec

[bug #13495] repetition operator syntax changed in 4.2.21

2005-06-22 Thread anonymous
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #13495 (project findutils): I like the patch, but would prefer to switch back to RE_SYNTAX_EMACS as default, which is *afaict* what find up to 4.2.20 used. I've thought a little bit about this and have realized that breaking backwards compability could be _very_ painful

[bug #13495] repetition operator syntax changed in 4.2.21

2005-06-21 Thread James Youngman
Update of bug #13495 (project findutils): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => jay ___ Follow-up Comment #1: This is the kind

[bug #13495] repetition operator syntax changed in 4.2.21

2005-06-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
URL: Summary: repetition operator syntax changed in 4.2.21 Project: findutils Submitted by: ametzler Submitted on: Die 21.06.2005 um 17:40 Category: find