Op Tue, 24 May 2005 03:49:56 +0200 (MET DST) schreef ik
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Disregard, please. I composed this message before receiving
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
L8r,
Buzz.
--
) | | ---/ ---/ Yes, this | This message consists of true | I do not
-- | | // really is | and false bi
Op Mon, 23 May 2005 01:12:58 -0700 schreef Paul Eggert
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Youngman) writes:
:
: > Gnulib guys, what's the significance of the changes made to
: > modechange.c? How should callers who previously used MODE_MASK_PLUS
: > modify their code to get the sa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Youngman) writes:
> Gnulib guys, what's the significance of the changes made to
> modechange.c? How should callers who previously used MODE_MASK_PLUS
> modify their code to get the same behaviour?
We couldn't find any programs that set some of the MODE_MASK bits but
not
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 04:57:14PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> When using a fresh gnulib to build findutils (CVS), breakage occurs. I
> came up with following patch to get parser.c to compile.
>
> I am however not sure it is correct.
Bas,
Thanks for looking at this.
I'm not sure. I looked
Op Sun, 22 May 2005 16:57:14 +0200 schreef ik
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
: ChangeLog-entry:
:
: 22-05-2005 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:
: find/parser.c (parse_perm): Accomodate gnulib modifications to
: mode_compile and mode_adjust, and the removal of mode_free.
Oops! Re
[This patch is for findutils. bug-gnulib Cc'd. Maybe they can answer my
questions...]
Op Mon, 02 May 2005 00:05:07 -0700 schreef Paul Eggert
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: I installed this patch to merge coreutils changes into gnulib.
[...]
: There are also changes to the APIs for modechange and for
