On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:23:58AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> Op Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:14:41 +0200 (MET DST) schreef ik
> in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [Do without visit_found ... another patch.]
>
> I just noticed, when we don't have visit_found, we don't need do_count.
> Please use the following p
Op Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:14:41 +0200 (MET DST) schreef ik
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[Do without visit_found ... another patch.]
I just noticed, when we don't have visit_found, we don't need do_count.
Please use the following patch instead of the earlier one. Sorry.
The suggested ChangeLog-entry rema
Op Thu, 23 Jun 2005 06:06:28 +0100 schreef James Youngman
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 05:47:47AM +0200, Buzz wrote:
:
: > I've since done some testing. The speed-gain is only ca. 0.5%.
: > The difference in binary-size is however also tiny.
: >
: > If, when you're back, you s
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 05:47:47AM +0200, Buzz wrote:
> I've since done some testing. The speed-gain is only ca. 0.5%.
> The difference in binary-size is however also tiny.
>
> If, when you're back, you say you /still/ prefer to do without
> visit_found, I'll prepare another patch.
That's what I
Op Wed, 15 Jun 2005 22:59:30 +0200 (MET DST) schreef ik
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: Op Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:33:16 +0100 schreef James Youngman
: in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
:: On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 10:10:55PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
[...]
:: > Following patch moves limit-checking and counting in
Op Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:33:16 +0100 schreef James Youngman
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 10:10:55PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
: > Hi,
: >
: > Following patch moves limit-checking and counting into visitors.
: > When neither is done, a visitor is added which will increment
: >
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 10:10:55PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following patch moves limit-checking and counting into visitors.
> When neither is done, a visitor is added which will increment
> items_accepted once, then remove itself from the list.
I like visit_count() and visit_limit(
Hi,
Following patch moves limit-checking and counting into visitors.
When neither is done, a visitor is added which will increment
items_accepted once, then remove itself from the list.
Possible ChangeLog-entry:
2005-06-15 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* locate/locate.c: Move ch
