On 3/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mine was just a quick hack to alleviate the matter, but yours surely
offers more than that.
Applied.
By the way, I think you introduced some broken things into current find/
CVS:
Where is get_stat_birthtime() defined?
It is from gnul
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 07:14:24PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> How about this patch, which gives a more specific error?
> [...]
Well, even better! :)
Mine was just a quick hack to alleviate the matter, but yours surely
offers more than that.
By the way, I think you introduced some broken thin
On 3/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When a predicate is not syntactically correct, the find parser
will currently say:
"invalid predicate `%s'"
which IMO obscures the fact that the predicate NAME may be alright, but
the number or format of parameters didn't match.
How a
Another quickie.
When a predicate is not syntactically correct, the find parser
will currently say:
"invalid predicate `%s'"
which IMO obscures the fact that the predicate NAME may be alright, but
the number or format of parameters didn't match.
Therefore:
"invalid or malformed predicat
