[bug #15416] find gives error when it shouldn't

2006-01-10 Thread Tim Waugh
URL: Summary: find gives error when it shouldn't Project: findutils Submitted by: twaugh Submitted on: Tue 01/10/06 at 12:35 Category: find Sev

Re: [patch] Recent findutils test suite failures

2005-11-24 Thread Tim Waugh
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 01:33:54AM +, James Youngman wrote: > What happens if the command you are executing via xargs is "echo foo > bar" rather than just "echo"? Does the required 2 turn into a > required 4? (I assume not, but just to be sure...) No, 2 is still fine. Tim. */ pgplBUKkErxN

Re: [patch] Recent findutils test suite failures

2005-11-23 Thread Tim Waugh
With this patch in addition to yours (and removing the .xo files), I no longer see any failures. diff -u findutils-4.2.26/lib/buildcmd.c findutils-4.2.26/lib/buildcmd.c --- findutils-4.2.26/lib/buildcmd.c 2005-11-23 09:47:48.0 + +++ findutils-4.2.26/lib/buildcmd.c 2005-11-23 09

Re: [patch] Recent findutils test suite failures

2005-11-23 Thread Tim Waugh
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:38:05AM +, James Youngman wrote: > Anyway, the attached patch includes a proposed fix for the test suite. > The modified tests still verify that the problem has been fixed, they > just no longer depend on the exact value of ARG_MAX on the system > where the test suit

Re: xargs: exec's with too many arguments

2005-11-22 Thread Tim Waugh
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 08:30:50AM +, James Youngman wrote: > Thanks for discovering and fixing the bug. With 4.2.26 I'm finding a test suite failure with the new tests on x86_64: Running /tmp/twaugh/findutils-4.2.26/xargs/testsuite/xargs.posix/arg_max_32bit_linux_bug.exp ... FAIL: arg_max