On Thursday 06 October 2005 17:49, Eric Blake wrote:
> Follow-up Comment #4, bug #14619 (project findutils):
>
> I don't think the original poster has discovered any bugs, rather just
> their misunderstanding of the (admittedly confusing) POSIX requirements.
I just read the man-page, where it says:
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 01:08, James Youngman wrote:
> Follow-up Comment #2, bug #14619 (project findutils):
>
> Does -perm /... do what you expected -perm +... to do?
I did a short test, and I believe that
find -type f -perm /+x
gives me what I used to get with
find -type f -p
