Re: stat and lstat should define their replacements

2005-06-24 Thread Derek Price
Paul Eggert wrote: >Please install it in gnulib; it looks good to me. Thanks for >following up on it. > > Done: 2005-06-24 Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Remove stat module & update lstat. * MO

Re: stat and lstat should define their replacements

2005-06-15 Thread Derek Price
Derek Price wrote: >I've attached a revised patch. In addition to integrating the >suggestions Bruno's patch received, it also includes changes to >modules/lstat, config/srclist.txt, and MODULES.html.sh. In addition to >this patch, lib/stat.c, m4/stat.m4, and modules/s

Re: stat and lstat should define their replacements

2005-06-07 Thread Derek Price
Paul Eggert wrote: >Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >>What does this mean for Bruno's recent patch for stat & lstat which >>removed the SunOS 4.1.4 support in addition to some other fixes? >> >> > >His patch made sense

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: findutils doesn't compile on sunos 4.1.4

2005-06-06 Thread Derek Price
Paul Eggert wrote: >I wouldn't object to minor and obvious tweaks that are checked out by >a real user who actually needs findutils to run on SunOS 4.1.4. My >assumption in dropping support for SunOS 4.1.4 was partly predicated >on nobody really needing it any more (and computer museums don't cou

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: findutils doesn't compile on sunos 4.1.4

2005-06-06 Thread Derek Price
Bruno Haible wrote: >James Youngman wrote: > > >>Certainly I believe that should >>define NULL (though my copy of the standard isn't to hand). >> >> > >On SunOS 4, it doesn't. GNU gettext has this ChangeLog entry: > >2001-10-31 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >* plural.y: Inclu