ChangeLog-entry remains the same:
2005-06-24 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* locate/locate.c (visit_count, visit_limit): New functions.
(locate): Use visit_limit or visit_count. Simplify main loop.
(main) Bail out early when limit is reached.
diff --exclude=
, when you're back, you say you /still/ prefer to do without
: > visit_found, I'll prepare another patch.
:
: That's what I would prefer, to be honest.
So here goes. (You /have/ taken note of my objections?)
: (the hotel has an SSH client!)
Imagine that. :)
Another sugges
Hi,
Following patch moves limit-checking and counting into visitors.
When neither is done, a visitor is added which will increment
items_accepted once, then remove itself from the list.
Possible ChangeLog-entry:
2005-06-15 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* locate/locate.c
Op Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:40:34 +0100 schreef James Youngman
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[locate -a]
: It's a good idea. However, "find" uses "-a" for and, like this
:
: find path predicate1 -a predicate2 -a predicate3
:
: which allows this to make sense as well
:
:find path predicate1 -a ( p
Hi,
Here is the aforementioned patch, to allow a --and (-a) option to
locate. I hope you like it...
Suggested ChangeLog-entry:
2005-06-11 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* NEWS, doc/find.texi, locate/locate.1: Document locate --and (-a)
* locate/locate.c: Implement
Hi,
Here is a patch which moves reading from the database and generating
the base_name into visitors. Support for reading a database from stdin
slipped in somehow...
Suggested ChangeLog-entry:
2005-06-08 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* NEWS, locate/locate.1, doc/fin
Hi,
Trying to compile findutils from CVS, I got a compiler-error.
Following patch fixes it.
Possible ChangeLog-entry:
2005-06-08 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lib/printquoted.h: Include stdio.h.
diff --exclude='*~' -Ndrup curr/findutils/lib/printquoted.h
min
Op Mon, 6 Jun 2005 06:03:10 +0100 schreef James Youngman
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:00:15AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
[...]
: > : * locate/locate.c: Fold case once, only when needed.
: >
: > Could you please confirm receiving the above mail, and t
Hallo James,
Op Tue, 31 May 2005 03:44:02 +0200 (MET DST) schreef ik
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
: Suggested ChangeLog entry:
:
: 2005-05-31 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:
: * locate/locate.c: Fold case once, only when needed.
Could you please confirm receiving th
e to me. (Except maybe the
{munged,original}_filename might be entered into a structure,
providing space for more parameters. (This should improve speed
for fastcall-compiled code))
Now for the casefolding-patch:
Suggested ChangeLog entry:
2005-05-30 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Op Mon, 30 May 2005 09:31:34 +0100 schreef James Youngman
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 11:11:52PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
[read each db once]
: A well-constructed patch, many thanks! I have applied it. In the
: future, when making a user-visible change, cou
intended to be applied.
A possible ChangeLog-entry:
2005-05-29 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* doc/find.texi: Add documentation for locate --print (-p), and the
use of non-options with --statistics.
* locate/locate.1: ditto.
* locate/locate.c: Rea
Op Tue, 24 May 2005 03:49:56 +0200 (MET DST) schreef ik
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Disregard, please. I composed this message before receiving
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
L8r,
Buzz.
--
) | | ---/ ---/ Yes, this | This message consists of true | I do not
-- | | // really is | and false bi
Op Mon, 23 May 2005 01:12:58 -0700 schreef Paul Eggert
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Youngman) writes:
:
: > Gnulib guys, what's the significance of the changes made to
: > modechange.c? How should callers who previously used MODE_MASK_PLUS
: > modify their code to get the sa
Op Sun, 22 May 2005 16:57:14 +0200 schreef ik
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
: ChangeLog-entry:
:
: 22-05-2005 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:
: find/parser.c (parse_perm): Accomodate gnulib modifications to
: mode_compile and mode_adjust, and the removal of mode
K_PLUS-flag?
Is it OK to set the umask-parameter to mode_adjust to zero?
ChangeLog-entry:
22-05-2005 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
find/parser.c (parse_perm): Accomodate gnulib modifications to
mode_compile and mode_adjust, and the removal of mode_free.
diff
Op Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:05:02 +0100 schreef James Youngman
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 04:44:50AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
[patch which implements a ``--non-existing'' (``-E'') option]
: I've applied your patch. Mnay thanks for you
Along the way I renamed visit_exists_[no]follow to
: visit_existing_[no]follow for consistency, and fixed a a few typos in
: the description of --nofollow (``treat broken symbolic links /count/
: as if they were exi/s/ting'').
: A possible ChangeLog-entry:
: 2005-03-08 Bas van Gompel <[
te as much.)
A ChangeLog-entry:
2005-03-08 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*import-gnulib.sh: Re-enable creation of gnulib/m4/Makefile.am.
diff -Ndrupb curr/findutils/import-gnulib.sh mine2/findutils/import-gnulib.sh
--- findutils/import-gnulib.sh 2005-02-28 22:56:48.
a few typos in
the description of --nofollow (``treat broken symbolic links /count/
as if they were exi/s/ting'').
A possible ChangeLog-entry:
2005-03-08 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*doc/find.texi: Document locate --non-existing (-E).
*locate/locate.1:
20 matches
Mail list logo