error (0, 0,
_("File system loop detected; "
"the following directory is part of the cycle: %s"),
safely_quote_err_filename (0, ent->fts_path));
Would it be clearer to stick to just saying "cycle" or "loop" but not using
both words? I'm just considering that we may be making it harder to
FWIW, I think AIX is compliant here.I believe that this syntax is valid:
for x; do y; done
... and this syntax is also valid
for x
do
y
done
... but
for x;
do
y
done
... isn't (at least in some POSIX versions - I don't know if this changed
at any point).
On 1/26/25 07:29, Collin Funk wrote:
On AIX, /bin/sh causes a testsuite failure with an output like this:
Running
/home/collinfunk/findutils-4.10.0.40-d4417/find/testsuite/find.gnu/execdir-multiple.exp
...
FAIL: execdir-multiple.new-O0, ./runme[6]: syntax error at line 7 :
`newline
On 1/24/25 16:03, Dietmar Hahn (Fujitsu) via Bug reports for the GNU find
utilities wrote:
From: Bernhard Voelker
The fts_cycle looks corrupted.
The underlying gnulib code seems to be a bit vague about this,
and the comment about coreutils is also not true (any more):
https://git.savannah.gnu
