[bug #51506] Better support for data processing with basenames

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #51506 (project findutils): > Which system test would be representative to show that reduced file names > can result in nicer run time characteristics because of less data transfer? Whom do you ask? For optimization issues, people usually come with a certain, reproducib

[bug #51506] Better support for data processing with basenames

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #51506 (project findutils): >What resources are you envisioning that '-printf %f\\n' uses that would not be used by adding a new option, … A bit of parsing could also be omitted for a string like “-printf %f\\n” if the desired output function could be selected by a build

[bug #51506] Better support for data processing with basenames

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #51506 (project findutils): What resources are you envisioning that '-printf %f\\n' uses that would not be used by adding a new option, when balanced against the pain of adding, documenting, and maintaining a new option, for something that is already such a corner case th

Re: is slocate database still new?

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 07/16/2017 07:49 PM, Igor Fontana wrote: >> EHLO, >> >> im running 4.6.0 and im getting this: >> >> glocate: ‘/var/lib/locate/locatedb’ is an slocate database. Support >> for these is new, expect problems for now. >> glocate: ‘

[bug #51506] Better support for data processing with basenames

URL: Summary: Better support for data processing with basenames Project: findutils Submitted by: elfring Submitted on: Wed 19 Jul 2017 03:06:47 PM CEST Category: find S