[bug #51220] [wishlist] Using -I with -n

Update of bug #51220 (project findutils): Status:None => Working as Intended Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #6: I did not expect

[bug #51220] [wishlist] Using -I with -n

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #51220 (project findutils): How'd that tennis ball get near my keyboard? Whoops, high magicker than a motherfucker. Worry about it. ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #51220] [wishlist] Using -I with -n

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #51220 (project findutils): Look, I don't care about you little JEW cocksucker pieces of shit or fixing this trivial little problem. I guarantee you I am going to hunt you stupid little faggot cocksuckers down and you will be deleted from the god computer based on my vote

[bug #51220] [wishlist] Using -I with -n

Update of bug #51220 (project findutils): Category:None => xargs Assigned to:None => berny ___ Follow-up Comment #3: The -I option alr

[bug #51220] [wishlist] Using -I with -n

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #51220 (project findutils): The example doesn't seem to show that -I is incompatible with -n. Indeed 'one two three four' isn't split into four arguments, but the documentation for -I says that it won't: -I replace-str Replace occurrences of replace-str in the in

[bug #51220] [wishlist] Using -I with -n

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #51220 (project findutils): It would help if you simplified the example. In this case, make the variable substitutions. And instead of using "cp" as the command which is executed, thus showing us only the error message "cp" reports and leaving us to guess what the comma