[bug #51151] [wishlist] xargs -o support for interactive commands

2017-06-06 Thread Bernhard Voelker
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #51151 (project findutils): I agree with Andreas: the findutils manpages are too detailed IMO; and it is a GNU recommendation to keep the man pages terse, and to have the detailed documentation in Texinfo format (which may be converted in other available formats like htm

[bug #51151] [wishlist] xargs -o support for interactive commands

2017-06-06 Thread Andreas Metzler
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #51151 (project findutils): On 2017-06-06 Thorsten Glaser wrote: > 3. In Andreas’ patch, obviously, do not remove the reword it slightly. > Rationale for #2 and #3: while the BSD extension is added, documenting this is > likely still good for when one searches the docu

[bug #51151] [wishlist] xargs -o support for interactive commands

2017-06-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Follow-up Comment #8, bug #51151 (project findutils): Hi Bernhard and Andreas, thanks, but I’d change a few minor things: 1. Do not remove the list of all options at the top, it really helps one to get a quick overview and the specific spelling if one only vaguely remembers the correct option bu