Re: findutils 4.6.0 v. Tru64 (strftime() v. "%F"?)

2017-05-25 Thread Steven M. Schweda
I've subscribed to the bug-findutils list, so I don't need a separate copy of these messages. For completeness, I ran the experiment on a Solaris 10 system and an AIX 6.1 system (which pretty much exhausts the UNIX division of my computer museum). On the Solaris system, "man strftime" sa

Re: findutils 4.6.0 v. Tru64 (strftime() v. "%F"?)

2017-05-25 Thread Paul Eggert
On 05/25/2017 07:54 AM, Eric Blake wrote: So yes, either findutils should be using nstrftime() and not strftime() (which will guarantee that these sequences work), or it is indeed time to patch gnulib to provide a replacement strftime() on platforms that are not POSIX-compliant (and then still pa

Re: findutils 4.6.0 v. Tru64 (strftime() v. "%F"?)

2017-05-25 Thread Eric Blake
[adding bug-gnulib] On 05/25/2017 12:43 AM, Steven M. Schweda wrote: >Tru64 is not alone. On an old HP-UX system, it's different but still > sub-ideal: > > dy# findutils-4.6.0/find/find . -name fred -printf '%C+\n' > May+16:18:11.00 > >There, "man strftime" says: > > [...] >