Re: [PATCH] clarify exit status handling of -exec command {} +

2016-04-17 Thread Kamil Dudka
On Sunday, April 17, 2016 22:46:22 Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 04/13/2016 03:07 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > * find(-exec): Explain how exit status is propagated if the > > -exec command {} + syntax is used. > > > > Reported at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1325049 > > Thanks for the report and the

Re: [PATCH] clarify exit status handling of -exec command {} +

2016-04-17 Thread Bernhard Voelker
On 04/13/2016 03:07 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > * find(-exec): Explain how exit status is propagated if the > -exec command {} + syntax is used. > > Reported at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1325049 Thanks for the report and the patch. I thought this was already documented somewhere, but obviously not

Re: xargs --negate-interactive

2016-04-17 Thread Bernhard Voelker
On 04/10/2016 04:26 PM, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: >> "BV" == Bernhard Voelker writes: > BV> Well, there are many possibilities, but there is already a way to > BV> to do it in xargs. So what would you want to achieve by saving a RET? > BV> I don't think it's about the wearing of the ENTER key o