On 01/11/2016 12:43 AM, Assaf Gordon wrote:
>> Suppose someone wants to find files smaller than 20MiB. Are you sure
>> that the best answer we should give them is that they should use
>> "find -size -20971520c"?
Although this is inconvenient, there are several ways for the user to
avoid doing the
Hello all,
> On Jan 10, 2016, at 17:43, James Youngman wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Bernhard Voelker
> wrote:
>> On 01/09/2016 04:41 PM, James Youngman wrote:
>>> Let's re-open the discussion about what to call the "sane" alternative to
>>> -size, and implement it this time.
[...
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Bernhard Voelker
wrote:
> On 01/09/2016 04:41 PM, James Youngman wrote:
>> Let's re-open the discussion about what to call the "sane" alternative to
>> -size, and implement it this time.
>
> I'm not so enthusiastic,
[...]
> I'd rather suggest to re-work the --help
On 01/09/2016 04:41 PM, James Youngman wrote:
> Let's re-open the discussion about what to call the "sane" alternative to
> -size, and implement it this time.
I'm not so enthusiastic, i.e., only 20:80 for adding such a -filesize option.
The question is: what functionality would it provide which co
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Bernhard Voelker
wrote:
> This removes the case folding option of sort (which is still buggy in
> many i18N implementations, and therefore maybe the reason for this bug).
> However, do you think the removal is worth to be mentioned in the NEWS,
> too.
Done. I als
* locate/updatedb.sh: fix typo in comment pointed out by Bernhard
Voelker.
* NEWS: point out that the order of file names in the locate
database is now different, but still unspecified.
---
NEWS | 5 +
locate/updatedb.sh | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
di
