[bug #46438] Please release a non-alpha version of recent findutils

Update of bug #46438 (project findutils): Severity: 3 - Normal => 4 - Important Status:None => Fixed Assigned to:None => jay Open/Closed:

Announcing the release of GNU findutils 4.6.0

I am pleased to announce the release of version 4.6.0 of GNU findutils. GNU findutils is a set of software tools for finding files that match certain criteria and for performing various operations on them. Findutils includes the programs "find", "xargs" and "locate". More information about findut

[bug #27369] 'ftsfind -ok ... <&-' attempts to read directory fd

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #27369 (project findutils): Eric, are you still working on this bug? ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savann

[bug #40309] Improved formatting and bugfixes for find.1

Update of bug #40309 (project findutils): Status:None => Fixed Assigned to:None => jay Open/Closed:Open => Closed

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation warning.

Applied; thanks!

[PATCH] Fix compilation warning.

xargs.c: In function 'fopen_cloexec_for_read_only': xargs.c:387:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] * xargs/xargs.c (fopen_cloexec_for_read_only): Return result. --- xargs/xargs.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/xargs/xargs.c b/xargs/xargs.c ind

Announcing the release of findutils-4.5.19

I am pleased to announce the release of version 4.5.19 of GNU findutils. GNU findutils is a set of software tools for finding files that match certain criteria and for performing various operations on them. Findutils includes the programs "find", "xargs" and "locate". More information about findu

Re: xargs: errno-buffer read failed in xargs_do_exec

Bernhard reported this as https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38583 and it was fixed in commit 14adbdd321a3cbcdd76feeeb403e8e958d2f4ca2. On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > The message comes if the parallelism of xargs is > increased/decreased several times in a short time. > >

[patch #1541] add "-dirslast" to process subdirs after normal files

Update of patch #1541 (project findutils): Status: Postponed => Wont Do Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[patch #1541] add "-dirslast" to process subdirs after normal files

Follow-up Comment #2, patch #1541 (project findutils): No response from submitter, so closing. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savann

[patch #8688] Spelling fixes

Update of patch #8688 (project findutils): Status:None => Done Assigned to:None => jay Open/Closed:Open => Closed __

[patch #8688] Spelling fixes

Follow-up Comment #1, patch #8688 (project findutils): Applied, thanks. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gn

Re: [Patches] Typo and formatting fixes for find.1 by Bjarni Ingi Gislason

Thanks; I have applied the patch. Thanks Bjarni. Please note that this change is only just small enough to be exempt from the need for a copyright assignment. If you would like to help findutils more in the future, it's a good idea to contribute a copyright assignment.Please let me know off

Re: Proposed release announcement for findutils-4.6.0 - request for comments

Thanks - I adopted your wording. On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2015-12-27 James Youngman wrote: > [...] >> 1. Some backward-incompatible changes have been made to find: >> - egrep regular expressions now work like GNU grep -E >> - Minor changes to the way nanos

[bug #46714] make oldfind optional

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #46714 (project findutils): Thanks for your help. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savanna

[bug #46714] make oldfind optional

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #46714 (project findutils): I applied the attached patch also. (file #35873) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: 0001-Apply-some-improvements-suggested-by-Mike-Frysinger.patch Size:2 KB __

Re: [patch] maint: avoid syntax-check failures

Thanks! Pushed as the attached two patches. On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > Hi James, > > the attached is a set of patches to avoid various failures from > 'make syntax-check'. They are supposed to be squashed into one > commit, and only left separate to ease the revi