On 01/05/2014 04:09 AM, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
> (tried "exec", but I guess that is a shell builtin...sigh)...
How about 'env' instead of 'exec'?
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital s
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
>
>
> James Youngman wrote:
>>
>> You can use the "sh -c" trick to run the first argument as the command.
>>
>
>
> Do you think the above case could be optimized? As I mentioned in my inital
> query, I wanted to avoid shell overhead on 8
On 01/05/2014 12:09 PM, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
> James Youngman wrote:
>> You can use the "sh -c" trick to run the first argument as the command.
> Do you think the above case could be optimized? As I mentioned in my inital
> query, I wanted to avoid shell overhead on 80 thousand sub-jobs.
Sure,
James Youngman wrote:
You can use the "sh -c" trick to run the first argument as the command.
Do you think the above case could be optimized? As I mentioned in my inital
query, I wanted to avoid shell overhead on 80 thousand sub-jobs.
I.e. is there any reason xargs couldn't run the a
You can use the "sh -c" trick to run the first argument as the command.
You can use -d to select the delimiter.
