> "JY" == James Youngman writes:
JY> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:46 PM, wrote:
>> Have it your way.
JY> Wow, what did I say to provoke that reaction?
I don't know if it is worth implementing either. I apparently did at one
time but it would take a lot of concentration for me to figure out w
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:46 PM, wrote:
> Have it your way.
Wow, what did I say to provoke that reaction?
I just wanted to be sure the change was worthwhile. Is that so
burdensome a request?
James.
P.S. odd how one is forced to search Google
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Re%3A+Can%27t+say+%22up+to+and+including%22+with+-newer+without+a+symmetrical+-older%22
for the original message, given the headers I received.
Have it your way. What really bothers me is cpio's saying it won't copy
because an older or same version exists. Why can't it cough up which and
not leave the user the task...
Thanks for spotting this stupid documentation error. I have fixed it
with the attached patch. I hope you find the updated documentation
clearer. If not, please shout.
Thanks,
James.
0001-find-state-that-execdir-command-is-run-locally-to-th.patch
Description: Binary data
Could you describe a significant use case where the proposed feature
would be essential?
I understand your symmetry point, but before committing all future
findutils maintainers to maintaining the additional code for the
lifetime of the package, we should be sure that's justified.
James.
Thanks for the patch. Applied (since you already have a copyright
assignment in place) and pushed. I made a small wording change and a
ChangeLog entry.
Thanks again,
James.
Thanks, I applied this directly (since you already have a copyright
assignment for findutils).
Sorry about the delay.
James.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> * lib/buildcmd.c (bc_push_arg): Take prefix length into account
> to avoid state->argbuf overflow.
> * NEWS: M
