[bug #38474] Unintended (?) behaviour change of -perm +mode predicate

2013-04-22 Thread Paul Eggert
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #38474 (project findutils): Thanks for catching that problem with 'havekind'. A patch is attached. I don't think the code should reject -perm /+0111, or -+0111 for that matter. 'chmod +0111 foo' has a well-defined meaning with GNU chmod, and it's nicer if 'find' is c

[bug #38474] Unintended (?) behaviour change of -perm +mode predicate

2013-04-22 Thread Eric Blake
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #38474 (project findutils): Paul's patch, as modified in commit 9040c5d, is not quite right. The bool havekind variable is now useless; it is set to true by all branches of the switch statement. It can safely be deleted, along with a later switch statement when havekind

[bug #38474] Unintended (?) behaviour change of -perm +mode predicate

2013-04-22 Thread James Youngman
Update of bug #38474 (project findutils): Status:None => Fixed ___ Follow-up Comment #8: I applied the patch in a slightly modified form, mainly to acommodate some changes I'd already

[bug #38791] doc: fix typos uncovered by texinfo 5.0

2013-04-22 Thread James Youngman
Update of bug #38791 (project findutils): Status:None => Fixed Assigned to:None => jay ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Thanks for the pa

Re: PATCH -- fix off-by-one bugs in locate

2013-04-22 Thread James Youngman
Actually I just forgot it. Fixed now. Thanks.