On 07/08/2011 10:55 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> This gives clients the option to try a non-invasive traversal,
>> where merely visiting a directory does not update its timestamp,
>> where such is supported by the kernel.
>>
>> Note that whiteout support and O_NOATIME support are
Eric Blake wrote:
> This gives clients the option to try a non-invasive traversal,
> where merely visiting a directory does not update its timestamp,
> where such is supported by the kernel.
>
> Note that whiteout support and O_NOATIME support are orthogonal:
> there is no way to get O_NOATIME beha
