OK, I'll try to use findutils-4.2.18.tar.gz into my own branch.
Another problem is, when I type "git checkout FINDUTILS_4_3_5-1" to switch
to the version 4.3.5, and use "sh import-gnulib.sh" for preparation, an
error arises:
...
configure.in:70: error: AC_REQUIRE: circular dependency of AC_GNU_SOU
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Kai YU wrote:
> Hi, I'm currently investigating how to fight software regressions with
> git bisect. Particularly, I want to use git bisect to help locate the
> #Bug12181 (http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?12181). However, when I use "git
> checkout FINDUTILS_4_2_18
On Sunday 03 April 2011 16:15:22 Kai YU wrote:
> Yes, I also guess that I have to use the equally old gnulib. The problem is
> I can use git to switch to the old version of findutils, but I don't know
> how to obtain the corresponding old snapshot of gnulib.
In case of up2date findutils, the infor
Yes, I also guess that I have to use the equally old gnulib. The problem is
I can use git to switch to the old version of findutils, but I don't know
how to obtain the corresponding old snapshot of gnulib.
2011/4/3 Kamil Dudka
> On Saturday 02 April 2011 19:54:48 Kai YU wrote:
> > Hi, I'm c
On Saturday 02 April 2011 19:54:48 Kai YU wrote:
> Hi, I'm currently investigating how to fight software regressions with
> git bisect. Particularly, I want to use git bisect to help locate the
> #Bug12181 (http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?12181). However, when I use "git
> checkout FINDUTILS_4_2
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:59 AM, oss wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if there any bug or what i make wrong ?
You're not quoting the command-line correctly.
> I think, this is a typically bug within spaces in the command, or ...
> The question is: How can i made better ?
I think exec "$cmd_string" would be
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Nick wrote:
> On 2010-09-04 11:36, James Youngman wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Nick wrote:
>> > - the item 'Add tests which allow [acm]time to be compared against a
>> > specified timestamp' seems already available by using -newerXt, or
>> > do I
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
>
>
>
> There doesn't seem to be a way to specify paths in 'updatedb' to allow for
> case-insentive matching.
Yes; updatedb was originally designed for Unix-like systems and when
we started supporting non-Unix filesystems, nobody really audit
Hi, I'm currently investigating how to fight software regressions with
git bisect. Particularly, I want to use git bisect to help locate the
#Bug12181 (http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?12181). However, when I use "git
checkout FINDUTILS_4_2_18-1" to switch to the version 4.2.18, it fails to
compi
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Andreas Bernauer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> $ echo foo | xargs -s1 echo
> xargs: can not fit single argument within argument list size limit
>
> I'd say, the error message should read:
> xargs: cannot fit single argument within argument list size limit
>
> Note 'can not' -->
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Cao, Da-Shi (EB-Presales-ZTE/HW-GZ)
wrote:
> I've get the most recent version of gunlib by "git clone" and it seems that
> the issue is resolved here.
> How should I proceed with my findutils?
There are 3 main options:
1. Wait for a new stable release (4.4.3 or
On Saturday 02 April 2011 17:16:11 James Youngman wrote:
> (resending, this time omitting the large patch with the .po file changes)
>
> I noticed today I had not done this. Sorry!
>
> I needed to add an extra few patches to:
> - update the version of gnulib and fix a dependency problem
> - fix t
(resending, this time omitting the large patch with the .po file changes)
I noticed today I had not done this. Sorry!
I needed to add an extra few patches to:
- update the version of gnulib and fix a dependency problem
- fix the declaration of run_in_dir
- temporarily move a pre-existing local
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Peggy Russell
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a suggestion and documentation update for `find`.
>
> The suggestion for findutils' find is to add a '-t, --verbose' or '--whatif'
> option similar to the '-t' in `xargs`. At a minimum it would show what `find`
> would gener
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Peggy Russell
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi, and thanks for the careful and detailed bug report.
> Why does `find` process file 'abc4' separately from files 'abc1-3',
> when they are in the same directory.
The answer is that it is a shortcoming in the design of find, but this
15 matches
Mail list logo