Re: findutils on interix

2010-10-27 Thread Markus Duft
On 10/28/2010 01:20 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/27/2010 05:12 PM, James Youngman wrote: >> >>> AFAIK, the maximum environment size >>> on interix is 32K, if that's of any interest to you... >> >> Does it express the size of this limit in a way that's relevant to the >> POSIX programming interface

Re: findutils on interix

2010-10-27 Thread Eric Blake
On 10/27/2010 05:12 PM, James Youngman wrote: > >> AFAIK, the maximum environment size >> on interix is 32K, if that's of any interest to you... > > Does it express the size of this limit in a way that's relevant to the > POSIX programming interface? Windows in general has a 32k limit on argumen

Re: findutils on interix

2010-10-27 Thread James Youngman
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Markus Duft wrote: > Hey :) > > I recently updated my findutils builds on interix (work without > any patches (except a gnulib patch i already submitted), thanks > for the great work ;) ), and stumbled across a small problem: > > mduft xargs $ find /usr/ | ./xargs

[bug #31424] _SC_ARG_MAX is unreliable on Interix

2010-10-27 Thread James Youngman
Update of bug #31424 (project findutils): Status: Fixed => None ___ Follow-up Comment #2: The patch does not work. Markus writes an update: owh - spoke too soon. there is no more p

Re: findutils on interix

2010-10-27 Thread James Youngman
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Markus Duft wrote: > On 10/27/2010 08:42 AM, Markus Duft wrote: >> On 10/23/2010 01:52 PM, James Youngman wrote: >>> Thanks.   I adopted a very slightly different approach, see >>> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?31424 >>> >>> The updated code is already pu

Re: findutils on interix

2010-10-27 Thread Markus Duft
On 10/27/2010 08:42 AM, Markus Duft wrote: > On 10/23/2010 01:52 PM, James Youngman wrote: >> Thanks. I adopted a very slightly different approach, see >> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?31424 >> >> The updated code is already pushed. > > The patch works as expected, thank you very much