On Monday 05 of April 2010 22:01:22 James Youngman wrote:
> I attach a set of patches. They're the same as the patches I emailed
> yesterday, but rebased against current head.
The patches look good!
I've applied all of them and built as findutils-4.5.7-4.fc14. Thanks!
Kamil
I've pushed the attached patch.
2010-04-06 James Youngman
* import-gnulib.config (modules): Use the getopt-gnu module from
gnulib rather than the (obsolete) getopt module.
From 1284636a2e4e64cc57fe8241fa0ed290205843f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Youngman
Date: Tue, 6
[it's customary to reply inline, rather than top-posting, on technical
lists]
On 04/05/2010 03:13 PM, rre...@iol.it wrote:
> Thank you very much for your kind and accurate answer! I have tried to
> modify my patch so as to solve the problems you pointed at. I know that
> looking at the content o
diff -Nur findutils/find/cmp.c findutils-rreale/find/cmp.c
--- findutils/find/cmp.c1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ findutils-rreale/find/cmp.c 2010-04-05 22:29:19.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
+/* Buffer primitives for comparison operations. Adapted from the
+ following files
Thank you very much for your kind and accurate answer! I have tried to
modify my patch so as to solve the problems you pointed at. I know that
looking at the content of a file is not in the spirit of find, but anyway
I believe it is a very useful exercise for me to go and hack such an
excellent p
On Monday 05 of April 2010 22:24:18 Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Monday 05 of April 2010 22:01:22 James Youngman wrote:
> > This is a known problem, Savannah bug #27213. Yesterday, I mailed
> > patches to the list which should fix this. See
>
> Mailed where actually? I somehow missed them and still
On Monday 05 of April 2010 22:01:22 James Youngman wrote:
> This is a known problem, Savannah bug #27213. Yesterday, I mailed
> patches to the list which should fix this. See
Mailed where actually? I somehow missed them and still don't see any
beyond this mail... The only patch I encountered
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sami Farin (CC'd) discovered some flaws in recent findutils and reported
> them at Red Hat bugzilla:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579476#c0
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579476#c2
>
> Here are propos
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #27983 (project findutils):
In your example, $tf1 is created in text mode, so it contains file names
listed with carriage returns. Then you use cat, which preserves binary mode,
through a pipe which also preserves binary mode. But this is an example of a
useless use of
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #27983 (project findutils):
Is the expectation in the test script valid?
> mount -t "$(cygpath -w "${dir}")" /textmode
[..]
> tf1="/textmode/file1.txt"
> tf2="/textmode/file2.txt"
[..]
> echo "foo" > "${tf1}"
> echo "bar" >> "${tf1}"
[..]
> cat "${tf1}" | xargs -i echo
Hello,
Sami Farin (CC'd) discovered some flaws in recent findutils and reported
them at Red Hat bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579476#c0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579476#c2
Here are proposed patches:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=404487
ht
Update of bug #27983 (project findutils):
Status:None => Wont Fix
Assigned to:None => ericb
___
Follow-up Comment #2:
Cygwin does prov
Applied and pushed. Thanks!
James.
Hello,
I tried to build from git and got this:
frcode.c: In function 'main':
frcode.c:226: warning: implicit declaration of function 'set_program_name'
mv -f .deps/frcode.Tpo .deps/frcode.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wall -Wall -Wshadow
-Wformat-security -Winit-self -
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:38 PM, rre...@iol.it wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have written a small patch (against findutils 4.4.2) that
> adds a switch to find (namely, -samecontent) in order to find
> duplicates of a file. In other words, the command
>
> find -samecontent FILENAME
>
> is now roughly equival
15 matches
Mail list logo
