Follow-up Comment #1, bug #25359 (project findutils):
Does the system under test have a stat()able /etc/passwd file? Can you
reproduce the problem manually? (This test passes for me here, obviously, or
4.5.3 would never have been released). Does the problem apply only to
ftsfind, or is oldfin
James Youngman wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Eddie Kohler wrote:
exclude=$(find . -name .find-ignore -printf '%h\n' | sort -u); find . \! \(
-false $(for e in $exclude ; do printf ' -o -name "%s" ' $e; done) \) ,
-true > /dev/null
=> 3.06s
There is a -prune missing from both find
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:22 AM, anonymous wrote:
>
> Follow-up Comment #2, bug #19374 (project findutils):
>
> Here is a patch:
>
> --- updatedb.org2009-01-27 13:29:28.575086300 +0100
> +++ updatedb2009-02-09 10:19:41.132505500 +0100
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
> # Trailing slashes result i
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Eddie Kohler wrote:
> exclude=$(find . -name .find-ignore -printf '%h\n' | sort -u); find . \! \(
> -false $(for e in $exclude ; do printf ' -o -name "%s" ' $e; done) \) ,
> -true > /dev/null
> => 3.06s
There is a -prune missing from both find expressions there
James Youngman wrote:
exclude=$(find . -name .find-ignore -printf '%h\n' | sort -u)
find . \! \( -false $( for e in $exclude ; do printf ' -o -name "%s" '
$e; done) \)
It's about twice as slow as -contains -- as you might expect, since it
traverses the directory structure twice.
find . -type d
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Eddie Kohler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I frequently use "find" to search collections of files while pruning certain
> directories. However, I'd often like to prune build directories and the
> like,
> and these don't have consistent names.
>
> One solution is to prune direc
Hi,
I frequently use "find" to search collections of files while pruning certain
directories. However, I'd often like to prune build directories and the like,
and these don't have consistent names.
One solution is to prune directories that contain a file named ".find-ignore".
This can be coded
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> [reposting to the right list]
>
> Following up on this post,
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.findutils.bugs/3894
>
> now that the gnulib/fts changes are in,
> here are the parts required (in addition to getting the
> latest fts.c)
I've updated findutils to a newer version of gnulib (the patch is attached).
There should be a performance increase for ftsfind here, but Jim
Meyering has a further patch to findutils to improve performance on
filesystems which do not populate the d_type member of struct dirent.
I will update the
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are three tiny patches.
>
> From 4af19b0784919915be4341b9917192c0d7dd232e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering
> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:32:29 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] find: avoid warning about unused local
>
> * f
10 matches
Mail list logo
