JY> If you would like to propose an illustrative problem for which
JY> your workaround is the most effective solution, we can probably
JY> include that in the documentation as an example.
OK, please mention something like:
-ok in contrast to -exec, has its stdin redirected for various reasons.
To
Update of bug #24748 (project findutils):
Severity: 3 - Normal => 1 - Wish
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
If you look at the menu bar at the top of this page, one of the items is
"Source Code". The
Update of bug #24561 (project findutils):
Release: 4.5.2 => 4.2.12
___
Follow-up Comment #2:
If we're not complying with POSIX, then we do need to fix this. The problem
appears to affe
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:30 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, but considering
>> A workaround to revive stdin on -ok is: -ok true \; -exec
> Will you
> A. Clamp down stdin on -exec too, for my own good; or
> B. Mention the workaround on the man page; or
> C. Stop clamping stdin on -ok, as peop
Applied; thanks.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From 9dbe9a747a2330a09d9fab04a39bb9c3de40fc19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:49:47 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] README-CVS: fix a tiny typo
>
> -