"George Spelvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is something that find has needed for quite a while. There is a
>> somewhat more general problem too - the ftsfind program itself seems
>> to stat files that fts() already stated, I think.
>>
>> Ther
"James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is something that find has needed for quite a while. There is a
> somewhat more general problem too - the ftsfind program itself seems
> to stat files that fts() already stated, I think.
>
> There may also be other opportunities for improvement,
On 2008-09-23 James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:11 PM, George Spelvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Based on what you write I would assume that this is true for both the
> >> find and the oldfind executables built
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:11 PM, George Spelvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Based on what you write I would assume that this is true for both the
>> find and the oldfind executables built in all even vaguely-recent
>> findutils releases.
>
> Er... I'm
"James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on what you write I would assume that this is true for both the
> find and the oldfind executables built in all even vaguely-recent
> findutils releases.
Er... I'm not familiar with the oldfind executable. I'm using the
Debian-compiled amd64 4.4
