Re: [bug #23996] arithmetic overflow when using -used

On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> + assert (nanosec < nanosec_per_sec); >> + >> + /* Perform the subtraction, and then check for overflow. >> +* On systems where signed aritmetic overflow

Re: [bug #23996] arithmetic overflow when using -used

James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > + assert (nanosec < nanosec_per_sec); > + > + /* Perform the subtraction, and then check for overflow. > +* On systems where signed aritmetic overflow does not > +* wrap, this check may be unreliable. The C standard > +

[bug #23996] arithmetic overflow when using -used

Update of bug #23996 (project findutils): Status:Works For Me => Ready For Test ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #23996] arithmetic overflow when using -used

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #23996 (project findutils): Please let me know if the attached patch fixes your problem. (file #16346) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: 44.0001-Fix-savannah-bug-23070-integer-overflow-when-parsi.patch