Re: Interpretation of locate -r in various locate implementations

2008-04-05 Thread Bob Proulx
James Youngman wrote: > I understand that "locate -r" works differently between GNU locate on > the one hand, and both mlocate and slocate on the other. GNU > locate uses Emacs-dialect regular expressions. Both mlocate and > slocate use POSIX BREs. That does seem to be a gratuitous differenc

[bug #22832] Problems with "find --help" doc and with "find" functionality

2008-04-05 Thread James Youngman
Update of bug #22832 (project findutils): Status:None => Invalid Assigned to:None => jay Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___

Re: Interpretation of locate -r in various locate implementations

2008-04-05 Thread James Youngman
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:05 PM, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As the community of users of > GNU locate, what are your preferences? Nobody answered at all. Really, does nobody have a preference? James.

[bug #22832] Problems with "find --help" doc and with "find" functionality

2008-04-05 Thread James Youngman
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #22832 (project findutils): Unix tools have never used the "tool ?" syntax, since it's essentially inconvenient; "?" is a shell wildcard: $ echo ? c X To pass a literal ? reliably to a program, it would need to be escaped: $ echo '?' ; echo ? ? ? The fact that the sh