Re: [Findutils-patches] [PATCH] -delete requires -depth

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:11:23AM +0100, James Youngman wrote: > I am proposing to make this change in findutils-4.3.9.Any objections? > > On 8/23/07, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2007-08-23 James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > The -delete action now requires

Re: Poll: what should happen when -delete fails?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [adding a wider audience by cc'ing bug-gnu-utils] According to James Youngman on 8/23/2007 4:24 AM: > A while back I implemented -delete for GNU find. Some comments have > been made that its behaviour when it fails are somewhat unexpected. > I though

Re: [Findutils-patches] [PATCH] -delete requires -depth

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to James Youngman on 8/23/2007 4:11 AM: > I am proposing to make this change in findutils-4.3.9.Any objections? Bruno raised the objection on savannah that this approach is not backwards-compatible (ie. scripts that used just -delete wil

Re: findutils po/ChangeLog file

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Leslie P. Polzer on 8/23/2007 3:42 AM: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:11:09AM +0100, James Youngman wrote: >> Did we not discuss quite recently eliminating the po/ChangeLog file? >> I cannot spot any related emails, but I'm fairly sure this

[bug #20865] -delete interacts with -prune

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #20865 (project findutils): James: I have not looked into your patch, but I don't really understand whose proposal you are following. To clarify: - The fix that I would prefer the most, would be to make -delete work with either type of traversal (depth or normal). Of c

Poll: what should happen when -delete fails?

A while back I implemented -delete for GNU find. Some comments have been made that its behaviour when it fails are somewhat unexpected. I thought at the time that I made the right tradeoffs, but that might not be the case. Although there is a Savannah bug open for this (https://savannah.gnu.org/b

Re: [Findutils-patches] [PATCH] -delete requires -depth

I am proposing to make this change in findutils-4.3.9.Any objections? On 8/23/07, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007-08-23 James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The -delete action now requires -depth rather than automatically > turning it on. > * find/p

Re: findutils po/ChangeLog file

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:11:09AM +0100, James Youngman wrote: > Did we not discuss quite recently eliminating the po/ChangeLog file? > I cannot spot any related emails, but I'm fairly sure this was > discussed? Can't remember anything like that. > My thinking is that po/ChangeLog is not very i

[bug #20865] -delete interacts with -prune

Update of bug #20865 (project findutils): Status: Confirmed => In Progress Assigned to:None => jay ___ Follow-up Comment #3: I agree that the

findutils po/ChangeLog file

Did we not discuss quite recently eliminating the po/ChangeLog file? I cannot spot any related emails, but I'm fairly sure this was discussed? My thinking is that po/ChangeLog is not very interesting. I propose to remove it.Would you prefer to see the .po file changes in findutils/ChangeLog,

[bug #20834] find -execdir segfaults if PATH is not set.

Update of bug #20834 (project findutils): Status: In Progress => Fixed ___ Reply to this item at: ___