Re: updatedb.c: call find via exec()

2007-04-11 Thread James Youngman
On 4/11/07, Dmitry V. Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:25:23AM +0200, Leslie P. Polzer wrote: > I gave this some thought and it seems to be the best solution. > > Any other ideas? Looks like I missed context of this question, sorry. Leslie is working on replacing the

Re: updatedb.c: call find via exec()

2007-04-11 Thread leslie . polzer
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:47:00PM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:25:23AM +0200, Leslie P. Polzer wrote: > > I gave this some thought and it seems to be the best solution. > > > > Any other ideas? > > Looks like I missed context of this question, sorry. Start at the subj

Re: updatedb.c: call find via exec()

2007-04-11 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:25:23AM +0200, Leslie P. Polzer wrote: > I gave this some thought and it seems to be the best solution. > > Any other ideas? Looks like I missed context of this question, sorry. -- ldv pgpwS8SkLD7eW.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: updatedb.c: call find via exec()

2007-04-11 Thread James Youngman
On 4/11/07, Leslie P. Polzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I gave this some thought and it seems to be the best solution. Any other ideas? I think that would work fine. James. ___ Bug-findutils mailing list Bug-findutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org

updatedb.c: call find via exec()

2007-04-11 Thread Leslie P. Polzer
I gave this some thought and it seems to be the best solution. Any other ideas? ___ Bug-findutils mailing list Bug-findutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-findutils