On 4/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Surely, but we can do it without installing the helper binary by
directly including the code.
Yes, I think that would be fine.We could even provide wrapper
scripts for use during transition periods:
#! /bin/sh
# frcode. Bear in min
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:22:02PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> I think we still need to retain the ability to create a locate
> database from a flat file. At the moment we can do this with code and
> bigram. I think any replacement would need to keep that ability.
Surely, but we can do it witho
On 4/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The current updatedb shell script needs the '*code' and 'bigram'
binaries to fulfil its duty. As the replacement will be in C, do we
still need those binaries?
I think we still need to retain the ability to create a locate
database from
The current updatedb shell script needs the '*code' and 'bigram'
binaries to fulfil its duty. As the replacement will be in C, do we
still need those binaries?
Leslie
--
NEW homepage: https://viridian.dnsalias.net/~sky/homepage/
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DD4EBF83
pgpiSNbJZoj8
