On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 08:37:48PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> >By the way, I'm currently also looking into the possibility of
> >porting findutils to MINIX 3. I miss it badly there!
>
> If it runs under QEMU or (better) Xen I can support it. Otherwise I
> can accept patches, but not guarantee
On 4/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you happen to have an idea WRT to the xattr testing problem
(reminder: tests will fail if xattr not supported on test file system)?
Coinvention - we just issue a warning message and skip the tests.
By the way, I'm currently also loo
On 4/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does findutils require developers to update ChangeLog, or is the
RCS log enough?
Please update the ChangeLog; it's a convention used by most GNU tools.
The format looks like this:
Timestamp Yourname
* filename (function1): what I chan
Does findutils require developers to update ChangeLog, or is the
RCS log enough?
--
NEW homepage: https://viridian.dnsalias.net/~sky/homepage/
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DD4EBF83
pgpGSuNnjeDdL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Bug-findu
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 01:15:02PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> ... that reminds me to remind you: don't forget the tests and
> documentation!
Not forgotten :)
Did you happen to have an idea WRT to the xattr testing problem
(reminder: tests will fail if xattr not supported on test file system)?
On 4/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maynot be available on all platforms, so configure
> should check for it.
Yeah, that's a TODO for me.
I just committed a change to the polzer branch in the git repository
(http://repo.or.cz/w/findutils.git) which does this. More gene
