On 1/13/07, Stephane Chazelas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, please disregard #18715, I had misread the documentation
and specification.
Hmm. What did you read that changed you mind?
James.
___
Bug-findutils mailing list
Bug-findutils@gnu.org
ht
Update of bug #18714 (project findutils):
Status: In Progress => Fixed
___
Follow-up Comment #2:
Fixed in the findutils-4.3.x CVS codebase.
This problem is fixed in the CVS code for findu
Update of bug #18384 (project findutils):
Severity: 3 - Normal => 2 - Minor
Status:None => Fixed
Assigned to:None => jay
Release
On 10/1/06, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/18/06, Randy J. Causey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I'm having a problem building findutils on a Sun 5.8 machine -
>
> Undefined first referenced
> symbol in file
> re_set_syntax
On 11/11/06, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/9/06, Bansal Pradeep-G20236 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am Pradeep Bansal working with Motorola, while I need to use "find". I
> find the man page of find is poorly documented not explained its option
> very clearly. I hope you
On 11/9/06, dean gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this patch adds a -sparse predicate which is true iff the object is a file
and the size is greater than the number of blocks * blocksize can
represent.
I have implemented this feature in the CVS code for findutils 4.3.x.
The original idea is yo
On 8/16/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello there,
Find below a patch to fix some typos in the manual, again current CVS.
Thanks - I went to apply this and found that they had already been
fixed. Perhaps you submitted a bug report with a patch that I already
applied or someth