Re: Problem with find + AFS + acl="l"

2006-11-03 Thread Daniel Richard G.
On Fri, 2006 Nov 03 18:30:00 +, James Youngman wrote: > > > >AFS in many respects disregards the Unix mode bits, giving primacy to ACLs. > >If you could enumerate the ways in which a canonical path might not be > >obtainable, I can test to see if any of them apply to AFS. > > A typical example

Re: Problem with find + AFS + acl="l"

2006-11-03 Thread James Youngman
On 11/2/06, Daniel Richard G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2006 Nov 01 20:58:21 +, James Youngman wrote: > > If we see a DT_UNKNOWN before anything else in a directory, we > wouldn't know whether to assume it's a directory or not, unless we had > previously seen a DT_DIR for "." or ".."