Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've tried out the CVS version of findutils+gnulib, and it does indeed
>> seem to fix the problem with inode-less filesystems, in addition to
>> using noticably less system time.
>>
>> I've also found that the -x
Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tried out the CVS version of findutils+gnulib, and it does indeed
> seem to fix the problem with inode-less filesystems, in addition to
> using noticably less system time.
>
> I've also found that the -xdev option of find no longer works: it
> output
Hi,
I've tried out the CVS version of findutils+gnulib, and it does indeed
seem to fix the problem with inode-less filesystems, in addition to
using noticably less system time.
I've also found that the -xdev option of find no longer works: it
outputs just a single line for the base directory.
Lo