On 3/22/06, Alan Iwi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here's a tiny patch to allow "-mode" as a synonym for "-perm", just because
> it's such an obvious thing for people to try to call it
The problem with this though is that they will end up with nonportable
shell scripts, surely?
I could be convinc
On 3/26/06, D Antryg M Revok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you /probably/ don't care, since it's been "good enough" for the GNU
> tradition ( to be arbitrary and broken ) for years, but incompetence is
> incompentence.
>
> If I rig my work to abuse all into obedience, everyone has the right to
> cal
On 3/28/06, Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: bug in FIND: argument list too damn long using -exec chmod 440 {} +
>
> But that should not suffer from an argument list too long problem.
> The command is being executed one at a time for every matching file.
No, the "+" suffix makes
