[bug #14614] Incorrect C code in findutils 4.2.25

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #14614 (project findutils): Oops, I've *really* checked the fix into CVS now. ___ Reply to this item at: __

[bug #13041] -I (-i) and -L shouldn't be exclusive

Update of bug #13041 (project findutils): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at: __

[bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25

Follow-up Comment #6, bug #14619 (project findutils): I've moved the other issue that Eroc discovered to bug #14748. Andreas, do you have any further thoughts on this? If you still believe it's a bug I'll refer to the POSIX documentation and try to figure out a way forward. However, if in any

[bug #14748] find -perm /zzz gives wrong result when zzz evaluates to an all-zero mask

Update of bug #14748 (project findutils): Item Group:None => Wrong result ___ Reply to this item at: __

[bug #14748] find -perm /zzz gives wrong result when zzz evaluates to an all-zero mask

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #14748 (project findutils): Eric also writes:- $ touch 000 100 111 777 $ for f in * ; do touch $f $f ; done ^ Obviously, that should be a chmod. ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #14748] find -perm /zzz gives wrong result when zzz evaluates to an all-zero mask

URL: Summary: find -perm /zzz gives wrong result when zzz evaluates to an all-zero mask Project: findutils Submitted by: jay Submitted on: Sat 10/08/05 at 06:25

[bug #14615] Coding rules

Update of bug #14615 (project findutils): Severity: 3 - Normal => 2 - Minor Status:None => Invalid Assigned to:None => jay Open/Closed

[patch #4371] Document interaction of -I with other options

Update of patch #4371 (project findutils): Status: Postponed => Done ___ Follow-up Comment #3: I have now applied this patch in a slightly modified form; there was nothing wrong with the

Re: Bug#329358: [bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25

On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 08:19:45AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > The man page no longer documents the obsolete -perm +mode, which, as I > stated earlier, really only makes sense for symbolic modes starting with > 'a', or for numeric modes. The man page is wrong in stating that you must > specify 'u'

Re: Bug#329358: [bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Ph. Marek on 10/7/2005 12:10 AM: > On Thursday 06 October 2005 17:49, Eric Blake wrote: > >>Follow-up Comment #4, bug #14619 (project findutils): >> >>I don't think the original poster has discovered any bugs, rather just >>their misunder