Eric Blake wrote:
> Chris Faylor (one of the cygwin maintainers) proposed a benchmark that
> times the entire operation, not just the xargs invocation:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2005-q3/msg00107.html
>
> His numbers, with a modified xargs that ignored the _SC_ARG_MAX limit,
> s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bob Proulx on 9/5/2005 3:33 PM:
> If it is not too much trouble could you do post some simple benchmarks
> showing that larger buffer sizes are significantly better than the 32k
> buffer sizes? If so then it would help to promote your cas
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #14587 (project findutils):
I've just applied the following patch, which should fix these remaining
problems.
___
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: e-option.patch Size:3 KB
Clarifications to -
