[bug #13880] find fails to descend into directories on HSFS filesystems on Solaris 9

2005-07-31 Thread James Youngman
Update of bug #13880 (project findutils): Status:None => Wont Fix Fixed Release:None => 4.2.24 ___ Follow-up Comment #4: If you have a sy

[bug #13188] No test suite tests for -perm +xx or -perm xx or -perm /xx

2005-07-31 Thread James Youngman
Update of bug #13188 (project findutils): Status:None => Fixed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: These tests now exist in the development code. A bug in the implementation of "-perm /NNN" w

Bug in the implementation of -perm /NNN

2005-07-31 Thread James Youngman
I've been adding test cases to the "find" test suite. In the course of this I have discovered a bug in the implementation of the "find -perm /NNN" test. This is a GNU extension which was introduced in findutils version 4.2.21 to work around a potential POSIX incompatibility relating to the use of

Re: Conversion of GNU find to use gnulib's fts interface

2005-07-31 Thread James Youngman
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 10:56:41AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have made a CVS branch and modified findutils to use fts also. This > > Great! Thank you for doing that! > I'll certainly switch to that version for my personal use. > In working on co

Re: Conversion of GNU find to use gnulib's fts interface

2005-07-31 Thread James Youngman
My earlier email described the branch that the fts find code lives on. If you want to test this you may find it helpful to use the test suite from the CVS trunk, not the branch. This has two advantages:- 1. It ensures that we use the same tests and don't end up with any unexpected incompatibil

Re: Conversion of GNU find to use gnulib's fts interface

2005-07-31 Thread Jim Meyering
James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have made a CVS branch and modified findutils to use fts also. This Great! Thank you for doing that! I'll certainly switch to that version for my personal use. In working on coreutils, sometimes I've wanted to use find on pathologically deep hierarch

Re: Conversion of GNU find to use gnulib's fts interface

2005-07-31 Thread James Youngman
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 09:44:11AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > this fails to build from source for me. Oops. > find.c:89: error: static declaration of 'default_prints' follows non-static > declaration > defs.h:523: error: previous declaration of 'default_prints' was here > /tmp/findutils-rft

Re: Conversion of GNU find to use gnulib's fts interface

2005-07-31 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2005-07-31 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > "autoreconf -i" is also not happy, this might be connected: > *prompt* autoreconf -i > m4/withfts.m4:1: warning: underquoted definition of FIND_WITH_FTS > run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' > or see http://sources.redhat.com/a

Re: Conversion of GNU find to use gnulib's fts interface

2005-07-31 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2005-07-31 James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > cvs -z3 -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/findutils \ > co -rfts-conversion findutils > Then you need to follow the simple instructions in the README-CVS file > to compile the findutils code. When building the code, don't forge