[bug #13650] find -exec rm -i {} ; broken since 4.2.12

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #13650 (project findutils): Consider this example: find a b c -mtime 2 -ok prog1 {} \; -o -exec prog2 {} \; With the (now) current code, prog2 will be able to read from stdin byt prog1 wil not. Is this really sensible? ___

[bug #13615] find -iregex fails on non-GNU systems

Update of bug #13615 (project findutils): Status:None => In Progress ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Waiting for patch to be applied to gnulib (see discussion on bug-gnulib mailing list) __

[bug #13650] find -exec rm -i {} ; broken since 4.2.12

Update of bug #13650 (project findutils): Status:None => Need Info ___ Reply to this item at: __

missing return statement at end of non-void function

Hello there, I just tried to compile Redhat Fedora package findutils-4.2.23-1 with the Intel C compiler version 8.1 The compiler said savedirinfo.c(296): warning #1011: missing return statement at end of non-void function "new_savedirinfo" The source code is return buf; } } Suggest

[bug #13650] find -exec rm -i {} ; broken since 4.2.12

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #13650 (project findutils): The initial patch also allows programs run via -ok to sleal the input stat "ok" wanted to read, so this modicied patch behaves differently for -ok and -okdir. ___ Additional Item Attachm

[bug #13495] repetition operator syntax changed in 4.2.21

Update of bug #13495 (project findutils): Depends on: => bugs #13615 ___ Reply to this item at: __

[bug #13650] find -exec rm -i {} ; broken since 4.2.12

Update of bug #13650 (project findutils): Item Group:None => Wrong result Assigned to:None => jay Release:None => 4.2.12 ___

[bug #13650] find -exec rm -i {} ; broken since 4.2.12

URL: Summary: find -exec rm -i {} \; broken since 4.2.12 Project: findutils Submitted by: ametzler Submitted on: Mit 06.07.2005 um 08:40 Category: find