On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 04:24:39AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> -ok should take, in addition to y, q: to quit, like ^C, and ?, to
> list choices. Maybe even add an n, an alias for "".
"N" should already work, and these should be portable to other locales
too (e.g. a translation could allow "s" f
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:33:00PM +0100, DervishD wrote:
> I didn't know that 4.2.19 had been released. I don't use to look
> in alpha.gnu.org O:) My fault.
alpha.gnu.org is for testing releases and other releases which for one
reason or another don't qualify as "stable". If there are no bu
ailScanner: Found a form in HTML message
Found a script in HTML message
Note to Help Desk: Look on the MailScanner in
/var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20050314 (message j2EKR1OA008836).
--
Postmaster
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for the
Hi James :)
* James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:25:36AM +0100, DervishD wrote:
> > Try this with find 4.2.18:
> >
> > $ ln -s /tmp example
> > $ find example -follow
> > find: example: Too many levels of symbolic links.
> This is fixed in f
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:25:36AM +0100, DervishD wrote:
> Try this with find 4.2.18:
>
> $ ln -s /tmp example
> $ find example -follow
> find: example: Too many levels of symbolic links.
This is fixed in findutils-4.2.19. See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-findutils/2
Hi all :)
Try this with find 4.2.18:
$ ln -s /tmp example
$ find example -follow
find: example: Too many levels of symbolic links.
This problem seems to be related to the 'O_FOLLOW' flag in 'open'
(open returns ELOOP). I don't know if the problem is related with my
libc (
