[Bug gprofng/32110] gprofng segfaults on parsing DWARF of clang++ 18.1.3 produced binary

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32110 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I cannot build. Looks like I need some additional installation: % ../../mx/mx --env ce-python build --dep PYTHON_JAVA_STANDALONE_SVM_JAVA24 <...> Traceback (most recent call last): File "<...>/gra

[Bug gprofng/28966] gprofng test failures on Fedora 35

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28966 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gprofng/28982] gprofng: collectorAPI.h/libcollector.h/libfcollector.h shouldn't be installed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28982 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29026] New: gprofng doesn't build with gcc 5.5

rofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- % gcc --version gcc (GCC) 5.5.0 Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There

[Bug gprofng/29065] test suite problems

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29065 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- Is it Intel or Arm ? How did you run make: cd YOUR_BUILD_DIR/gprofng && make check or in another way? How did you configure your build ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug gprofng/29026] gprofng doesn't build with gcc 5.5

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29026 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gprofng/29065] test suite problems

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29065 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug gprofng/29065] test suite problems

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29065 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug gprofng/29102] New: gprofng: assertion in gprofng/src/Expression.cc:139

Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- It's a regression in QLparser since we started using bison To reproduce, set a filter: % gprofng display text -filter '(1,2) SOM

[Bug gprofng/29102] gprofng: assertion in gprofng/src/Expression.cc:139

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29102 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gprofng/29113] Build error for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host since CLOCK_MONOTONIC does not exist

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29113 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gprofng/29116] gprofng fails to build on i686-linux-gnu, aarch64-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116 --- Comment #10 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- How do you configure your build ? It looks like there are two bugs here: 1. libgp-sync.so may not link with libc. In run time, libgp-sync.so has to dlopen libc and use dlsym to find pthread_cond_w

[Bug gprofng/29116] gprofng fails to build on i686-linux-gnu, aarch64-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116 --- Comment #11 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- The build was configured with --target=i686-linux-gnu. Does this means that all binaries will be the 32-bit ? I see that gprofng/libcollector/synctrace.c was built on x86_64 without -m32 option:

[Bug gprofng/29131] No rule to make target 'gprofng.1', needed by 'all-am'. Stop. For arm

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I cannot reproduce this on my build. How do you configure your build ? Is it Intel or Arm ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29143] gprofng fails to build on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29143 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from Vlad

[Bug gprofng/28984] Bad __collector_getpc implementation

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28984 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/28983] gprofng: Don't build with -mx32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28983 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from Vlad

[Bug gprofng/29143] gprofng fails to build on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29143 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-06-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug gprofng/29113] Build error for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host since CLOCK_MONOTONIC does not exist

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29113 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- Has the problem been fixed in your build ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/28968] gprofng doesn't build with -Werror=format-security

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28968 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Vla

[Bug gprofng/29143] gprofng fails to build on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29143 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug gprofng/29113] Build error for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host since CLOCK_MONOTONIC does not exist

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29113 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/28968] gprofng doesn't build with -Werror=format-security

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28968 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29191] gprofng ignores --sysconfdir configuration option

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29191 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug gprofng/29131] No rule to make target 'gprofng.1', needed by 'all-am'. Stop. For arm

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29116] gprofng fails to build on i686-linux-gnu, aarch64-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving t

[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I cannot reproduce the problem. I see in my builds that HAVE_DECL_BASENAME is always defined: % grep HAVE_DECL_BASENAME BLD/gprofng/config.h #define HAVE_DECL_BASENAME 1 We use AC_CHECK_DECLS([base

[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from Vlad

[Bug binutils/29361] New: Makefile:26: *** missing separator. Stop

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- When I clone binutils-gdb.git to ./binutils and run build in the same directory, the build failed: % git clone https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git

[Bug binutils/29361] Makefile:26: *** missing separator. Stop

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29361 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- 1. About gprofng/autom4te.cache: I just cloned git binutils-gdb % clone https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git binutils-gdb.git % cd binutils-gdb.git % find . -name autom4te.cache -ls There i

[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Vla

[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 --- Comment #10 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- % git log --pretty=format:"%h - %an, %ar --> %s" --graph --name-status * e89f145f92a - GDB Administrator, 3 hours ago --> Automatic date update in version.in| | M bfd/version.h * 8df729f4f96

[Bug gprofng/29364] libgprofng.so: needs to link against -pthread

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29364 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- We build with $(PTHREAD_CFLAGS) and link with $(PTHREAD_LIBS) We use AX_PTHREAD in gprofng/configure.ac to set up PTHREAD_CFLAGS and PTHREAD_LIBS. I see in build that PTHREAD_CFLAGS is set correctl

[Bug gprofng/29364] libgprofng.so: needs to link against -pthread

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29364 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Vla

[Bug gprofng/29364] libgprofng.so: needs to link against -pthread

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29364 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug binutils/29361] Makefile:26: *** missing separator. Stop

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29361 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- Why don't you want to fix the configure script and report this limitation ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29368] The installation process should check for the makeinfo version

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29368 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29392] [display html] Unexpected line format in summary file

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29392 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug gprofng/29351] [display html] Move dynamic loading of modules to a later stage

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29351 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot

[Bug gprofng/29352] [display html] Fix the message Hexadecimal number > 0xffffffff non-portable

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29352 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gprofng/29353] [display html] Fix a lay-out issue in the html disassembly files

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29353 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot

[Bug gprofng/29356] [display html] Execution fails if gprofng is not included in PATH

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29356 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29410] [display html] Argument "  0." isn't numeric in numeric gt (>)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29410 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug gprofng/29476] gprofng.texi makeinfo build failure on centos 7

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29476 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- We need makeinfo 6.5 or newer. It looks like lines 196-200 in gprofng/configure.ac are incorrect: % cat -n gprofng/configure.ac ... 196case x"`$MAKEINFO --version | grep 'GNU texinfo'`" i

[Bug gprofng/29479] Collection fails when built without java support: symbol lookup error: ...-binutils-2.39/bin/../lib/gprofng/libgp-collector.so: undefined symbol: __collector_jprofile_start_attach

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29479 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-08-13 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug gprofng/29479] Collection fails when built without java support: symbol lookup error: ...-binutils-2.39/bin/../lib/gprofng/libgp-collector.so: undefined symbol: __collector_jprofile_start_attach

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29479 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29477] Build failure on musl: collector_module.h:78:13: error: duplicate member ‘pwrite’

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29477 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gprofng/29521] man pages are not in the release tarball

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at oracle

[Bug gprofng/29477] Build failure on musl: collector_module.h:78:13: error: duplicate member ‘pwrite’

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29477 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I cloned git://git.musl-libc.org/musl, built and installed. I fixed the build problems in gprofng/libcollector. But I see that only musl-gcc is installed. How can I install the musl c++ compiler ? mu

[Bug gprofng/29477] Build failure on musl: collector_module.h:78:13: error: duplicate member ‘pwrite’

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29477 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I fixed build issues. But the run time problem is not fixed. getcontext() is absent in libc on musl. Why ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29476] gprofng.texi makeinfo build failure on centos 7

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29476 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29579] ld: .libs/libgp_collector_la-mmaptrace.o (symbol from plugin): in function `dlclose': on i586

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29579 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I have a fix. I just started our tests. If there will be no regression I send diffs for review tomorrow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29107] gas testsuite parallel jobs fail (gprofng?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29107 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- This is a side-effect of our fake installation for gprofng testing: >> # Make a temporary install dir to run gprofng from, and point at it >> remote_exec host "sh -c \"rm -rf tmpdir; mkdir -p tmpd

[Bug gprofng/29579] ld: .libs/libgp_collector_la-mmaptrace.o (symbol from plugin): in function `dlclose': on i586

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29579 --- Comment #6 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- Are your build problems resolved ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29667] gprofng build with srcdir != builddir writes into the source dir

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29667 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29465] [docs] File version.texi is created in the binutils source directory

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29465 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gprofng/29107] gas testsuite parallel jobs fail (gprofng?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29107 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug gprofng/29663] gprofng fails to find libgp-collector.so

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29663 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug gprofng/29788] New: gprofng cannot display Java's generated assembly code

y: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- gprofng can display Java byte code but cannot display Java's generated assembly code. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug gprofng/29788] gprofng cannot display Java's generated assembly code

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29788 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29646] Various warnings

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29646 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29935] New: Callers of Java 'itable stubs' are wrong on ARM64

iority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Charlie Hunt wrote: We [Oracle & Ampere teams] are trying to look at the Callers of Java "itable stub" on Ampere&#x

[Bug gprofng/29935] Callers of Java 'itable stubs' are wrong on ARM64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29935 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving t

[Bug gprofng/29593] error: '__u64' undeclared (first use in this function) for aarch64-linux-musl host

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29593 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-11 Status|UN

[Bug gprofng/29470] [test suite] The test suite should be made more flexible

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29470 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29987] bfd/archive.c:1447: undefined reference to `filename_ncmp'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29987 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug gprofng/30006] Failure to build binutils-2.40 on i686

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gprofng/30006] Failure to build binutils-2.40 on i686

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I hope - YES. I have no experience with Docker and Ubuntu. If you have a simple instruction, could you please send it to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the b

[Bug gprofng/30043] libgprofng.so.* are installed to a wrong location

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30043 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from Vlad

[Bug gprofng/30036] Build failure on aarch64 w/ glibc: symbol `pwrite64' is already defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30036 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-25 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug gprofng/30006] Failure to build binutils-2.40 on i686

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 --- Comment #10 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I hope I installed docker correctly. But when I run: % docker run --platform linux/386 --rm --net=host -v $(pwd):/output -h $(hostname)-i686 -it satmandu/crewbuild:alex-i686.m58 Unable to find imag

[Bug gprofng/30006] Failure to build binutils-2.40 on i686

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 --- Comment #12 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- % docker pull --platform linux/386 satmandu/crewbuild:alex-i686.m58 Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": dial tcp 3.216.34.172:443: i/o timeout -- You are receiving

[Bug gprofng/30006] Failure to build binutils-2.40 on i686

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 --- Comment #13 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- % curl -vvv https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/ ... * TLSv1.2 (IN), TLS header, Supplemental data (23): * Mark bundle as not supporting multiuse < HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized < content-type: application

[Bug gprofng/30043] libgprofng.so.* are installed to a wrong location

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30043 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/28972] gprofng libraries should be installed under $(pkglibdir)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28972 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug gprofng/30006] Failure to build binutils-2.40 on i686

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 --- Comment #14 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I installed Ubuntu and reproduced this problem in Docker. This small test demonstrates the build problem: % cat test.c void *dlopen (const char *pathname, int mode) { return (void *) 0; } __att

[Bug gprofng/30006] Failure to build binutils-2.40 gprofng using gold

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 --- Comment #16 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- The build is OK when I configure with -fuse-ld=bfd. Is it a known problem with ld.gold ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/30036] Build failure on aarch64 w/ glibc: symbol `pwrite64' is already defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30036 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I cannot reproduce the problem on my machines. My gcc on aarch64 doesn't generate the 32-bit binaries: % gcc x.c -m32 gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-m32’ How do you configure your bu

[Bug gprofng/30093] gprofng SIGSEGV when processing unusual dwarf

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30093 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/30036] Build failure on aarch64 w/ glibc: symbol `pwrite64' is already defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30036 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- My fixes are in the master branch. Could you try to build gprofng. Is your build problem fixed ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/30195] [display text] Source code location can not be found

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30195 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Vla

[Bug gprofng/30195] [display text] Source code location can not be found

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30195 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug gprofng/30088] [collect app] CPU frequency is inadvertently printed in the help output on aarch64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30088 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gprofng/30281] error: multiple definition of `pwrite@GLIBC_2.2'; on i586-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30281 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Vla

[Bug gprofng/30281] error: multiple definition of `pwrite@GLIBC_2.2'; on i586-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30281 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- See also Bug 30006 - Failure to build binutils-2.40 gprofng using gold I use OL9 and gcc-11: % uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 5.15.0-0.30.1.el9uek.x86_64 #2 SMP Mon Mar 21 14:34:58 PDT 2022 x8

[Bug binutils/30281] error: multiple definition of `pwrite@GLIBC_2.2' with LTO and symver attribute

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30281 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot

[Bug gprofng/30089] [display text] Incorrect thread count shown on aarch64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30089 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gprofng/30036] Build failure on aarch64 w/ glibc: symbol `pwrite64' is already defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30036 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug binutils/30006] Failure to build binutils-2.40 gprofng using gold

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Component|gprofng |binutils See Also|

[Bug binutils/30281] error: multiple definition of `pwrite@GLIBC_2.2' with LTO and symver attribute

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30281 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gprofng/30360] New: [gprofng collect] Seg. Fault when application uses std::thread

Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- The small test below demonstrates the problem: % cat t.cc #include #include void thread_function() { std

[Bug gprofng/30360] [gprofng collect] Seg. Fault when application uses std::thread

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30360 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Vla

[Bug gprofng/30360] [gprofng collect] Seg. Fault when application uses std::thread

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30360 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug gprofng/30486] New: Function name contains "-- no functions found"

iority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- % gprofng display text -func t.er Functions sorted by metric: Exclusive Total CPU Time Excl. Total Incl. TotalName CPU

[Bug gprofng/30486] Function name contains "-- no functions found"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30486 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29470] [test suite] The test suite should be made more flexible

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29470 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug gprofng/30490] New: -Wsign-compare warning in gprofng build

: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Need to fix this warning: binutils-gdb.git/gprofng/src/LoadObject.cc: In member function ‘Function* LoadObject::find_function(uint64_t)’: binutils-gdb.git

  1   2   3   >