https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16715
Thomas McGuire changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas at kdab dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16715
--- Comment #1 from Thomas McGuire ---
Created attachment 7483
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7483&action=edit
C-only testcase
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16715
--- Comment #2 from Thomas McGuire ---
Attached a C-only testcase (forgot to rename the files from .cpp to .c, but I
don't think that matters). The testcase simply outputs the function pointer of
a function in a shared library, and one can see
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16715
Thomas McGuire changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7483|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16715
--- Comment #4 from Thomas McGuire ---
Note that on x86-64, this works, but is *not* solved like the hacky method that
Ian Lance Taylor describes in his blog.
Instead of using an undefined symbol with an actual value in main, x86-64 will
crea