[Bug gold/16808] New: ld.gold doesn't know about -Ofast

2014-04-04 Thread quequotion at mailinator dot com
gold Assignee: ian at airs dot com Reporter: quequotion at mailinator dot com CC: ccoutant at google dot com This error broke complation of systemd-git from AUR: /usr/bin/ld.gold: fatal error: -Ofast: invalid option value (expected an integer): fast The man page for ld

[Bug gold/16808] ld.gold doesn't know about -Ofast

2014-04-04 Thread quequotion at mailinator dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16808 --- Comment #1 from quequotion at mailinator dot com --- The manpage for ld says: -O level If level is a numeric values greater than zero ld optimizes the output. This might take significantly longer and therefore probably should only be

[Bug gold/16808] ld.gold doesn't know about -Ofast

2014-04-04 Thread quequotion at mailinator dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16808 --- Comment #2 from Que Quotion --- Changed this option in LDFLAGS from -Ofast to -O4 and compilation proceeds as normal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug gold/16808] ld.gold doesn't know about -Ofast

2014-04-04 Thread quequotion at mailinator dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16808 --- Comment #5 from Que Quotion --- Marking my own bug invalid. This was a misunderstanding. Somehow I'd gotten away with feeding the linker flags like -Ofast before, but had I read the documentation I might have realized this doesn't make se