Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: peter.smith at linaro dot org
Target Milestone: ---
I'm raising this as a result of an investigation of a buildbot failure found
whilst trying to link libcla
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: peter.smith at linaro dot org
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 10051
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22233
Peter Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter.smith at linaro dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22233
--- Comment #2 from Peter Smith ---
This is related to PR21868, the fix for that PR has a bug that triggers when
the stub_owner section also needs erratum fixes. In this case the address of
the thunks is not calculated correctly, resulting in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22233
--- Comment #4 from Peter Smith ---
Thanks for the comment, I'll leave the patch as it is for now as I think it
helps to have the view_offset added in each case. Happy to remove it if others
prefer though.
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20765
Peter Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter.smith at linaro dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20765
--- Comment #4 from Peter Smith ---
Created attachment 10649
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10649&action=edit
Update erratum_stub addresses on each relaxation pass
Attaching patch to fix the internal fault. The patch
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20765
--- Comment #5 from Peter Smith ---
Created attachment 10650
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10650&action=edit
Use a field that is not used in operator<() for erratum_stub validity
Attached patch that adds a new field
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22764
Peter Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter.smith at linaro dot org
: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: peter.smith at linaro dot org
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
In a recent change to LLVM (https://reviews.llvm.org/D44355) an attempt was
made
: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: peter.smith at linaro dot org
Target Milestone: ---
This enhancement has the same text as:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22969 but applies to ld.bfd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22970
--- Comment #2 from Peter Smith ---
Hello Nick,
Thanks for the patch. I'm travelling at the moment; I will try this out when I
get back to the office on Monday.
Peter
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22970
--- Comment #3 from Peter Smith ---
Hello Nick,
I've been able to try out the patch. It looks like it is doing what I'd expect
for the R_AARCH64_TLSLE_LDST8_TPREL_LO12_NC relocation.
When I went back to the original LLVM patch, I tried the e
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: peter.smith at linaro dot org
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
In arm.cc the code that permits v5t interworking instructions
14 matches
Mail list logo
