Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
when building git, util-linux, or lzo with the following CFLAGS:
-fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -Os -g0
-fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #1 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
the bug #14189 ( https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14189 ) may be
related.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
CC: ccoutant at google dot com
firefox 27.0.1 fails to build with gold.
Error relocating
/src/build/firefox/mozilla-release/firefox-build-dir/dist/bin/libxul.so:
gTLSThreadID: symbol not found
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
the release tarballs of binutils 2.24 and gdb 7.6 were generated with an
ancient autoconf version (2.64), which causes long-fixed and
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #2 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
ping.
anyone up for bisecting this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16728
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.25
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16728
--- Comment #1 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
ping.
fixing this bug is crucial to make gold fit for real-world usage; instead of
staying a toy.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16728
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #3 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
the bug is present in 2.23.1, 2.23.2, 2.24, and 2.24.51 snapshot from today,
but not in 2.22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14189
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maillist-gdb at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7634|0 |1
is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #9 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
Created attachment 7663
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7663&action=edit
generated object files
sorry for the delay; back from holidays.
here are the ge
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16948
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||16370
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #11 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
according to the contents of the "abfd" variable when the assert is raised,
it's caused by the stdin.o and fflush.o object files in libc.a, which both do
some weak symbo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #13 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
Created attachment 7670
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7670&action=edit
testcase including all object files and stripped down libc.a
savefile.c in the t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #14 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
Created attachment 7671
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7671&action=edit
standalone testcase including reduced libc sources
while trying to reduce t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7638|0 |1
is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #17 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
the "host" (i.e. the machine the compiler runs on) is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
(sabotage linux using musl libc).
binutils 2.24 was built with these flags:
--target=arm-linu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #18 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
i was able to reproduce the issue on a glibc box (opensuse 11.2) with the
latest testcase and pre-compiled musl-cross toolchain from
https
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #19 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
oops wrong link, the codesourcery toolchain which raised the assertion was
https://sourcery.mentor.com/GNUToolchain/package12813/public/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/arm-2014.05-29-arm-none
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16728
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maillist-gdb at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #20 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
(In reply to maillist-gdb from comment #18)
> i was able to reproduce the issue on a glibc box (opensuse 11.2) with the
> latest testcase
> i was, however able to reproduce
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #22 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
are you sure you're not using a hardfloat toolchain ? those seem to be immune
to the bug. anything else i tested is affected.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7672|0 |1
is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #24 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #21)
> I am sorry but this bug is just not reproducible with the FSF mainline
> binutils sources. :-( I can only conclude that the bug m
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
: critical
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
the -l: command line parameter is supposed to be usable with an explicit
filename
root:/src/build/bash/bash-4.3$ ls -la lib/readline
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17532
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|binutils|ld
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17532
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17532
--- Comment #4 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
oh. i see. thanks for the expanation.
however i'm curious if you agree that the old behaviour was more useful, even
though it was unintended ?
also i spent about 1 hour trying to
32 matches
Mail list logo
