[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Luis Machado changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luis.machado at linaro dot org

[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 --- Comment #21 from Luis Machado --- For the record, here's the complete build log: https://gdb-buildbot.osci.io/#/builders/8/builds/1618/steps/7/logs/stdio -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Luis Machado changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 --- Comment #26 from Luis Machado --- Thanks for handling this so promptly! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 --- Comment #27 from Luis Machado --- I'm still seeing this for aarch64 (and s390). ../../binutils-gdb/opcodes/z80-dis.c: In function 'ld_ii_ii': ../../binutils-gdb/opcodes/z80-dis.c:606:36: error: comparison is always false due to limited ra

[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 --- Comment #30 from Luis Machado --- I'm giving this a try on the buildbot. The GCC in my box may be too old to have that warning enabled/present. I'll let you know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 --- Comment #31 from Luis Machado --- I've confirmed the cast to (signed char) does fix the build failure for aarch64. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/28254] gas 2.63.1 fails to generate debugging information for aarch64 .S files

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254 Luis Machado changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at arm dot com -- You are re

[Bug gas/28254] gas 2.63.1 fails to generate debugging information for aarch64 .S files

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254 Luis Machado changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.38 Target|

[Bug gas/28254] gas 2.63.1 fails to generate debugging information for aarch64 .S files

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254 --- Comment #4 from Luis Machado --- Did you try Alan's proposed solution of marking the section with "ax". Or is there a reason why the section shouldn't be marked as such? For the record, this isn't really a GDB bug, but a change in behavio