[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-04 Thread joelanderson333 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 --- Comment #1 from Joel Anderson --- Created attachment 12591 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12591&action=edit message with premature EOF -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/26082] New: infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-04 Thread joelanderson333 at gmail dot com
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: joelanderson333 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12590 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12590&action=edit message missing end of message line If a message text file ends

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-04 Thread joelanderson333 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 --- Comment #2 from Joel Anderson --- Created attachment 12592 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12592&action=edit proposed patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-06 Thread joelanderson333 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 --- Comment #7 from Joel Anderson --- I do think that it is important to note that the two new patches alter windmc behavior to accept a file where the period is immediately followed by a EOF instead of a newline or carriage return and newline

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-07 Thread joelanderson333 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 --- Comment #10 from Joel Anderson --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #8) > Can you say from which version on this behavior was changed ? I just tested with the executable packaged with the Windows SDK for Windows 7 (7.1) and found

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-09 Thread joelanderson333 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 --- Comment #13 from Joel Anderson --- I think that patch looks great! It is more readable than the current HEAD, the intent is much clearer, and it is consistent with mc.exe behavior in both scenarios. -- You are receiving this mail because