[Bug binutils/13730] New: Trying to link against gt.m object code

2012-02-23 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13730 Bug #: 13730 Summary: Trying to link against gt.m object code Product: binutils Version: 2.21 Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: binuti

[Bug binutils/13730] Trying to link against gt.m object code

2012-02-23 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13730 --- Comment #1 from James Michael DuPont 2012-02-23 17:38:55 UTC --- Created attachment 6239 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6239 simple assembler stubs to define missing symbols created from this c code, and just rename

[Bug binutils/13730] Trying to link against gt.m object code

2012-02-23 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13730 --- Comment #2 from James Michael DuPont 2012-02-23 17:39:37 UTC --- Created attachment 6240 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6240 the mumps file , very simple one. the mumps file , very simple one. -- Configure bugmail

[Bug binutils/13730] Trying to link against gt.m object code

2012-02-24 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13730 --- Comment #6 from James Michael DuPont 2012-02-24 11:37:51 UTC --- Thanks Nick, Compiled and tested. I will be looking into gtm more in detail. here are my test results : h4ck3rm1k3@gcc10:~/experiments/binutils$ ./ld/ld-new ~/test/attachme

[Bug binutils/20838] New: Strange disassembly for 4d in x86-64 mode

2016-11-18 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com Target Milestone: --- GNU objdump (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.27.51.20161108 The disam seems to skip the first byte if presented with another op afterwards. please let me know

[Bug binutils/20838] Strange disassembly for 4d in x86-64 mode

2016-11-18 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20838 --- Comment #2 from James Michael DuPont --- It did not disasm the first instruction as a byte, it subsumed it, the 4d is lost. Here are some permutations over the data bytes with different lengths and values to show what is outputted. Also

[Bug gas/20842] New: Crash of AS on invalid data

2016-11-19 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com Target Milestone: --- This line was genrated by objdump : 9f5ed5: 66 c4 01 01 66 c4 data16 vpcmpgtd %xmm12,%xmm15,%xmm8 Feeding it back to as : regen2.asm: Assembler messages: regen2

[Bug binutils/20838] Strange disassembly for 4d in x86-64 mode

2016-11-19 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20838 --- Comment #3 from James Michael DuPont --- Here is another problem I can reproduce : 1. asm input: test5: epz; add %al,(%rax); Assembling produces this : 1test5: 2 F3repz; 3 0001

[Bug binutils/20838] Strange disassembly for 4d in x86-64 mode

2016-11-19 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20838 --- Comment #4 from James Michael DuPont --- Created attachment 9650 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9650&action=edit example objdump output from bad test cases these are produced by objdump from the as input file atta

[Bug binutils/20838] Strange disassembly for 4d in x86-64 mode

2016-11-19 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20838 --- Comment #5 from James Michael DuPont --- Here are some invalid operations that are generated by objdump but cannot be compiled by as : # 44 63 0a movslq (%rdx),%r9d test20: .byte 68 # 44 .byte 99 # 63 .byte 10 # 0a compilin

[Bug binutils/20838] Strange disassembly for 4d in x86-64 mode

2016-11-19 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20838 --- Comment #6 from James Michael DuPont --- Created attachment 9651 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9651&action=edit example binary input these are annotated bytes for x86 64 assembler from instructions were produced

[Bug binutils/12076] New: Duplicate line of code

2010-10-01 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
ReportedBy: jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12076 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is

[Bug binutils/12087] build fails on 'make'

2010-10-03 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com 2010-10-03 09:51 --- please include the results of -save-temps when compiling. gcc --verbose -save-temps -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../binutils -I. -I../../binutils -I../bfd -I../../binutils/../bfd -I../../binutils

[Bug binutils/12089] build fails on 'make' #1

2010-10-03 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com 2010-10-03 15:27 --- ../../binutils/sysdep.h:79:1 #if !HAVE_DECL_STRSTR extern char *strstr (); #endif It should look more like this, no? extern char *strstr(const char *, const char *) __ATTR_PURE__; not

[Bug binutils/12089] build fails on 'make' #1

2010-10-04 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com 2010-10-04 17:34 --- This occurs on hurd as well. GNU flubber 0.3 GNU-Mach 1.3.99/Hurd-0.3 i386-AT386 GNU gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i486-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='D

[Bug binutils/12089] build fails on 'make' #1

2010-10-09 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12089 --- Comment #6 from James Michael DuPont 2010-10-09 17:08:05 UTC --- Flubber is down, cannot reproduce. http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.hurd.bugs/cutoff=19821 will try again soon. mike -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/user

[Bug binutils/12089] build fails on 'make' #1

2010-10-20 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12089 --- Comment #8 from James Michael DuPont 2010-10-20 10:57:57 UTC --- I am guessing that this has something to do with my branch, I will check now. mike -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You a

[Bug binutils/12089] build fails on 'make' #1

2010-10-20 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12089 James Michael DuPont changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever Confirmed|

[Bug binutils/12089] build fails on 'make' #1

2010-10-20 Thread jamesmikedupont at googlemail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12089 --- Comment #11 from James Michael DuPont 2010-10-20 18:13:44 UTC --- Bert was testing my branch and had the problem. http://gitorious.org/binutils-introspector/binutils-introspector I will have to check out the autotools stuff. i suspect it is