--
What|Removed |Added
CC||brolley at redhat dot com,
||aoliva at sourceware dot org
http:
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot
||or dot jp, aoliva at
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-18
12:49 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-22
14:56 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-07/msg00237.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-22
15:05 ---
Please provide a SMALL STANDALONE testcase.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-23
11:39 ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> Created an attachment (id=2836)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2836&action=view)
> gdb crashes because abbrev_offset is incorrect (zero)
>
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-23
13:57 ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> Unfortunatly I only have windows machines at my site.
> The versions that I specified in the Makefile are the ones that I can use.
You seem to have a problem with gd
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-23
14:17 ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> The object file that is generated by the linker in my example already
> contains
> the erroneous compile unit header, specifically the abbrev_offset is zero.
> Th
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-23
19:45 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=2838)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2838&action=view)
> shell script to reproduce the bug
>
> the script as
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-23
22:05 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I used "--prefix=/scratch/devsk
> -with-lib-path=/scratch/devsk/lib:/scratch/devsk/usr/lib:/usr/lib:/lib "
> when configuring, so that /scratch/devsk/lib
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-24
04:58 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> >
> > You have a very strange setup. You better come up with a testcase
> > which doesn't require me to copy things into /usr/lib.
>
> so
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-24
14:21 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to comment #8)
> > > >
> > > > You have a very strange setup. You better come up with a testcase
> &g
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-24
16:56 ---
Still works for me with Today's CVS:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 6753]$ make
gcc -m32 -B/export/home/hjl/bugs/binutils/6753/usr/bin/ -I. -fPIC -c -o
mysymbol.o mysymbol.c
mkdir -p /export/home/hjl/bugs/bin
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-24
17:23 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
>
> Is there a CHANGELOG for cvs version I can inspect with respect to
> 2.18.50.0.7?
There are ChangeLog files in each subdirectory. You can do a diff on
them.
-
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6766
---
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-24
17:46 ---
You can download the Linux binutils source from
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/
and compare ChangeLogs.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6753
--- You are
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-24
17:59 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Is 2.18.50.0.8 the release where you reported success?
It should work.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6753
--- You are receiving this mail beca
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-26
16:25 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Subject: Re: New: Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"?
>
> Hi H.J.
>
> > Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"?
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-29
15:41 ---
The current patch is at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-07/msg00361.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3191
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-14
22:58 ---
You can't pop/push 32bit registers in 64bit mode.
--
What|Removed |Added
S
unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6848
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-18
17:29 ---
This is caused by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-11/msg00065.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||6848
nThis||
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3469
--
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-18
18:01 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] set-5]$ cat f.s
.data
.globl x
.long x
x=y
y:
.long 1
z:
.long 1
x=z
[EMAIL PROTECTED] set-5]$ gcc -c f.s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] set-5
ponent: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6853
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for t
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-22
22:06 ---
I guess it is OK since libfoo.so should be linked with libbar.so.
--
What|Removed |Added
s: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6873
--- Y
nassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6877
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-11
01:08 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00086.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6877
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-16
16:46 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-17
17:19 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Testcase in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493651
>
> GNU_RELRO 0x016bc8 0x00216bc8 0x00216bc8 0x0003d0
> 0x0003c0 R 0x1
dTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
CC: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au,bug-binutils at gnu dot
org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6931
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-01
19:18 ---
It happens on Linux/ia32 with gcc 4.3.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6931
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-01
23:15 ---
The bug is in bfd_elf_set_group_contents:
symindx = 0;
if (elf_group_id (sec) != NULL)
symindx = elf_group_id (sec)->udata.i;
if (symindx == 0)
{
/* If called from the assemb
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-02
01:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=2974)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2974&action=view)
Testcases
Those tests failed:
FAIL: ld-elf/group4
FAIL: ld-elf/group5
FAIL: ld-elf
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-03
15:16 ---
It still isn't right:
bash-3.2$ cat
/export/gnu/src/binutils/binutils/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/group.s
.section .text.foo,"axG",%progbits,foo_group,comdat
redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6948
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-07
03:59 ---
Fixed by cp-demangle.c update.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-11
23:47 ---
Arch may be changed by the .arch directive. However, when we
generate NOPs, we lost the .arch information. We need to know
the arch for NOP, which may not be necessarily the same as the
one specified by
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-12
01:48 ---
The Linux binutils has a patch for PR 6412. Please try this patch:
--- binutils/readelf.c.solaris 2008-10-11 18:47:31.0 -0700
+++ binutils/readelf.c 2008-10-11 18:46:18.0 -0700
@@ -4452,7
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||6915
nThis||
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6412
--
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-12
09:52 ---
By default, assembler assumes CPU takes all instructions supported
by assembler. You can use -march=XXX to limit instructions to only
those supported by XXX.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-12
09:49 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> But currently the only arch flags checked in i386_align_code was cpui686 which
> is where we should disable use of NOPL for mentioned reasons.
If you want to run the bin
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-12
12:44 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created an attachment (id=2997)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2997&action=view)
> binutils-cvs-fix2-i386-nop.patch
>
> Add bitfie
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-12
12:45 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created an attachment (id=2997)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2997&action=view)
> binutils-cvs-fix2-i386-nop.patch
>
> Add bitfie
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-12
21:30 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Sorry but how can PROCESSOR_UNKNOWN mean it can run any instructions? It's
> unknown! Therefore we must use lowest common denominator to expect it to work
> on
>
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-12
21:35 ---
This testcase works for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ cat nops.s
.text
nop:
movsbl %al,%esi
.p2align 4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ as --32 -o nops.o nops.s -march=i486 -mtune=i686
[EMAIL
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-14
11:41 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Subject: Re: binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so
> due to missing symbols
>
> > I think Nick's patch is wrong. :-(
>
> Doh!
>
>
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6993
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-29
01:54 ---
We need to support near16, near32, far16, and far32:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/119517
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6993
--- You are receiving this mail because
: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6994
--- You are receiving t
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-29
07:02 ---
Does this patch make sense?
--- ./expr.c.ll 2007-10-30 11:48:37.0 -0700
+++ ./expr.c2008-10-28 23:43:00.0 -0700
@@ -241,6 +241,12 @@ generic_bignum_to_int64 (void)
}
#endif
+struct
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-29
22:37 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It doesn't make sense for the assembler to use such suffixes, since the size
> of
> the number is completely defined by the context, unlike C.
It is useful to
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-11-07
14:39 ---
Please show "readelf -Sg TargetLowering.o" in
/usr/src/llvm-2.3/Release/lib/libLLVMSelectionDAG.a.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-11-07
17:22 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=3048)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3048&action=view)
> readelf of object file
>
There is:
There are no s
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-11-29
20:01 ---
Please provide tools/CMakeFiles/divine-mc.dir/divine-mc.s as well as
the assembler command options used to reproduce the bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot
||com
http://sourceware.org
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-01
21:18 ---
We have .plt aligned at 32byte and .text aligned at 64byte. .text is
right after .plt. After the first relaxation pass, we have .text
at 0x1b7fbc0 and .plt at 0x1af5c20. .plt size is 0x89fa0. Then we find
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-01
22:07 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-12/msg7.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7036
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-02
18:30 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The 'divine-mc.s' file has almost 27 MBs and I am not sure how to find out the
> assembler command option.
>
>
You can bzip divine-mc.s and put it somew
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7103
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-17
18:00 ---
It works for me on trunk as of 20081210.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet||arm-elf
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7093
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-17
19:12 ---
amarok-1.4.8-5.fc9.src.rpm won't compile on Fedora 10. I can build
amarok-1.4.8-5.fc9.src.rpm on Fedora 9 and amarok-2.0-2.fc10.src.rpm
on Fedora 10.
--
What|Re
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-21
17:24 ---
Please provide all inputs so that I can reproduce it on
Fedora 9/10.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-22
00:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=3621)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3621&action=view)
A testcase
bash-3.2$ make
cc -fPIC -c -o bar.o bar.c
./ld -shared -o libbar.so bar.o
cc -
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-22
00:49 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-12/msg00237.html
--
What|Removed |Added
ponent: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,pluto at agmk dot net
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9679
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-22
17:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=3622)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3622&action=view)
A testcase
cc -fPIC -c -o foo.o foo.c
cc -fPIC -c -o bar.o bar.c
./ld -shared -o libx.s
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-22
18:28 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-12/msg00241.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9679
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-23
14:50 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-02
17:04 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-02
19:39 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-04
19:04 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-01/msg00043.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7059
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-04
19:07 ---
Closed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-05
14:49 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> A patch is posted at
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-01/msg00043.html
It is wrong:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-01/msg00049.html
--
Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: x86_
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-13
22:06 ---
I saw it on Linux/x86:
[...@gnu-6 9727]$ cat x.s
.section.text.foo,"axG",@progbits,foo,comdat
.globl foo
.type foo,@function
foo:
.byte 0
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-13
22:39 ---
We should check section groups to properly support ld -r --gc-sections:
1. If all sections in a section group are removed, we should also
remove the group section.
2. If any sections in a section group is
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ld crashes in bfd/elf.c |"ld -r --gc-sections --
|bfd_elf_set_group_contents()|entry" doesn't work with
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-14
18:07 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-01/msg00196.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9727
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-14
21:56 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-19
22:11 ---
Can you provide a tar file with instructions for the testcase?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-20
15:01 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> It was under the given link (download->tar):
> http://github.com/uzytkownik/nios/tarball/master
>
> Simple make should compile it. nios is the resulting file.
I
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-20
22:18 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I'm not quite sure if it is a bug or feature request (at least on mailong list
> it was pointed out as bug). I try to produce an ELF in multiboot format -
> there
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-20
22:25 ---
Can you put ".section .setup,"ax",@progbits" in arch/i386/multiboot.S?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9749
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Yo
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-20
22:43 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Can you put ".section .setup,"ax",@progbits" in arch/i386/multiboot.S?
>
> It works. But, despite this is m
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
00:49 ---
Please provide a testcase to show what you have mind. What
should happen when there are mixed absolute and relative
filenames in executable?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
17:09 ---
I can add switches based on CPUID features. I can't add switches
for instructions without feature bits from CPUID.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9782
--- You are receiving
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
17:19 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Specifically, most of the files I deal with have a source in a tree at
> /usr/src/debug/kernel-2.6.27/*
>
> Now, what I would like to do is make a prefix so that
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot
||com
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
20:07 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Subject: Re: Additional switches to disallow processor supplementary
> instructions
>
>
> --- On Sun, 25/1/09, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
wrote:
>
>
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
20:13 ---
Please provide a small testcase.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
20:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=3686)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3686&action=view)
A patch
Please try this patch.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
20:45 ---
Is this a regression? What is the last working binutils?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9785
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
21:07 ---
FRV doesn't support 64bit host
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|hjl dot too
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
22:14 ---
Here is the patch:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-01/msg00315.html
This patch supports relative prefix:
bash-3.2$ ./objdump -S --prefix=src --prefix-strip=6 libx.so
libx.so: file format
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-26
17:53 ---
You can't disable an instruction at configure time. However,
you can select an instruction set based on CPUID:
-march=CPU[,+EXTENSION...]
generate code for CPU and EXTE
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-27
01:46 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> It would be better to allow the system builder to choose the instruction set
for the machine at compile time, rather than making such decisions at runtime.
>
Please read c
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-29
15:46 ---
The problem is
[ 1] .setupPROGBITS0010 005000 003000 00 0 0
4096
isn't marked with AX.
--
What|Removed |
101 - 200 of 659 matches
Mail list logo
